Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82076 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2010 14:04:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Nov 2010 14:04:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 32716 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2010 14:05:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 32618 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2010 14:05:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Developers List" Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 32610 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2010 14:05:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:05:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aheritier@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.171] (HELO mail-wy0-f171.google.com) (74.125.82.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:05:06 +0000 Received: by wyb39 with SMTP id 39so5409002wyb.30 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:04:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=kl4Q22fZXJs8460K7maHICiQhYvd/wRjRBDyQ3e3Wyg=; b=Klpj8wC4F9+m2ZPa+o5ktNBanOyKmGY6Eq7wKts56YGFA8JHjBXEZlDxh8qev/x1Fe fVVICEZNJa/SmfIB3zGYwb9AR0t/ovTX/rS8lBbMNm8M/h9Mxj5r/RGsApBK1FlESH5S 1m9uvHdEnSketveJiTafFNkIOkzH2w+6uVE6E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=EAtThbBUVmWQEjOpDCY9Eo5Jq0R0JJMmvRevV1BiEicwc0qTxq4S/43VRAMkPHBd4p JqqQtNtCOWyZSWJfU5qj7n47ySNP/VBAZ4FAIWxgVvEnl5k7ETR90PgHatdV/UYWzCnj zC2CFDaZiITyQuy9Wnuw3TRzmrnc0iSsTfHw4= Received: by 10.227.142.84 with SMTP id p20mr15557500wbu.182.1288620284251; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.60] (mea77-4-88-171-115-235.fbx.proxad.net [88.171.115.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ga16sm5217434wbb.19.2010.11.01.07.04.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Deprecate eclipse:eclipse plugin From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Arnaud_H=E9ritier?= In-Reply-To: <20E369C8-D8C7-4186-BBCE-4AAF7133924E@maven.org> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:04:14 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20E369C8-D8C7-4186-BBCE-4AAF7133924E@maven.org> To: "Maven Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) For the eclipse plugin, I think that just moving it to retired isn't a = good think because even if we are agree that this one is now really = difficult to maintain, this is always the preferred integration way with = eclipse in many corporate environments. Thus we cannot just say to our community that we just stop to maintain = it. We have to propose something else. m2eclipse or Q4E are the best choices for now but they don't cover all = what eclipse:eclipse can do and they have always some = performances/stabilities issues with large projects. Everybody can fork eclipse:eclipse plugin (and many teams already did = it) but I think we should provide a solution for them to try to share = their changes. How will we communicate around these changes ? On Nov 1, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > I started moving any of the ones discussed here: >=20 > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/retired/ >=20 > If anyone disagrees we can move them back but I think the ones suggest = so far are good candidates. >=20 > On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >=20 >> Following up from a discussion on the user list. I think it's time to = be realistic about providing a healthy level of support for plugins = here. I think it makes more sense to reduce the foot print of plugins we = say we support and do those well as opposed to housing many plugin that = just don't get much love. I would ask people to think about the plugins = we're housing that we shouldn't. Probably a thread per plugin would be = fine for discussion.=20 >>=20 >> To that end the plugins I'll send the first thread. >>=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> Jason >>=20 >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Jason van Zyl >> Founder, Apache Maven >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >> --------------------------------------------------------- >>=20 >> Our achievements speak for themselves. What we have to keep track >> of are our failures, discouragements and doubts. We tend to forget >> the past difficulties, the many false starts, and the painful >> groping. We see our past achievements as the end result of a >> clean forward thrust, and our present difficulties as >> signs of decline and decay. >>=20 >> -- Eric Hoffer, Reflections on the Human Condition >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Jason >=20 > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- >=20 > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. >=20 > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society >=20 >=20 >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org