Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.171 as permitted
 sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=B53bPsMA+5+YN5EP1bfRCdiYGpLGBxc9RiobvDrTRYM8I/ENX3IqVjAZtHT7MBlysY
         UWMgrl1zCHxB520/mdB60Mx6jxgUsr97EHa4r9EbrQi+NPc9aKW3Q0SuZ+r/Fc+oixP7
         lyLHog0TNcSw8NI4G8n7S+lStegFG+lcKhr2Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4C607AD0.7010806@apache.org>
References: <AANLkTinUr=46HBfQXA2qRS_gYqPuLLEOu1fF++kh-Dvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C607AD0.7010806@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:22:36 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimX=ebOHRix0VE6xH16MO9fAKQVdG+1d_drq8bC@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3
From: Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com>
To: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c3c48a75357048d765919

--0015174c3c48a75357048d765919
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I just checked: http://bit.ly/dsx5l1

Releases may not be vetoed
>

I had forgotten that one!

-Stephen

On 9 August 2010 23:01, Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org> wrote:

> I vote -1 to release the Site Plugin as it is staged.
>
> Here are my reasons:
>
> * The site for 3.0-beta-1 is hopelessly outdated. It's files are from
> before the 2.1 version was released. This means that important pointers
> about the Doxia upgrade is missing. The POM snippets has hardcoded
> versions (2.0.x versions). These are just examples. I've tried to merge
> over all of the changes to the site from trunk to the 3.x-branch. See
> commits@ for details. We also need to have a good migration document on
> the plugin's site to help users transition from version 2.x. Oliver has
> started such a document on the wiki, but in my opinion it needs to be in
> the plugin's site. I'm willing to help fix the documentation.
>
> * There is close to no Javadocs for the 6 new classes. If we are to
> support the code the person who wrote it must document it properly. We
> have done poorly in this regard earlier and it's time to change that.
>
> * If I read the code correctly in the SiteDeployMojo and
> SiteStageDeployMojo, proxy support (including tests for it) has been
> disabled. If we release without proxy support it has to be a conscious
> decision and it has to be documented.
>
> * A comment in the POM in relation to wagon says "disabled webdav ..."
> and "providers not anymore in core". Does that mean that you cannot
> deploy the site over webdav? I haven't tried it myself, as I don't have
> a webdav server available for testing.
>
>
> On 2010-08-07 21:54, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> > Hi,
> > In order to have a good companion to the coming Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2
> release.
> > I'd like to release Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-1 for maven 3.
> > We solved 10 issues :
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11146&version=15554
> >
> > Staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-070/
> >
> > Guide to testing staged releases:
> > http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
> >
> > Notes :
> > * this release has been build using the staged Apache Maven 3.0-beta-2
> > (so you must use the staged repository [1] )
> > * some informations can be found [2], specially how to configure your
> > pom in order to be able to continue building site with both maven 2.x
> > and maven 3.
> >
> >
> > Vote open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1
> >
> > +1 from me
> >
>
>
> --
> Dennis Lundberg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>

--0015174c3c48a75357048d765919--