maven-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Mercury status and roadmap
Date Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:40:45 GMT
On 21/11/2008, at 12:09 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:

>
>
>>>
>>> 2. switch several plugins to use mercury for resolution
>>> 2.1 dependency plugin
>>> ?? .. open for suggestions
>
>> I commented in the JIRA, but I think this should only live on a  
>> branch
>
>> until Mercury is final. It can be a good way to test Mercury, but
>> shouldn't get into a release. We have this bad cultural habit of
>> getting stuck in alphas otherwise :)
>
>
> For the plugins I agree. For Maven 3, I do not. There's no benefit in
> having a branch of 3.0 that is the only one that works. The plan is to
> use Mercury to replace large chunks of the resolution code. Mercury
> itself can be alpha while it's being used in maven alphas. It should  
> be
> 1.0 final though before Maven 3.0 final is done.

Yep, certainly.

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org


Mime
View raw message