Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 gcjtmd-turbine-maven-dev-759@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted
 sender)
To: dev@maven.apache.org
From: Mauro Talevi <mauro.talevi@aquilonia.org>
Subject: Re: Maven 2.1.0 GA Plan
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:45:14 +0100
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <g98gfa$eqp$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <48B726A9.1050709@commonjava.org>
 <2BABBE7D2A66E04DB8A66A527D29927E404564@intrepid.infinity.nu>
 <alpine.OSX.1.10.0808281758050.311@sfimac.local>
 <2BABBE7D2A66E04DB8A66A527D29927E404565@intrepid.infinity.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707)
In-Reply-To: <2BABBE7D2A66E04DB8A66A527D29927E404565@intrepid.infinity.nu>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>

Brian E. Fox wrote:
> Exactly. I don't think we need to reopen this up to a bunch more
> changes, we can make more releases later. If I thought we would be
> opening a can of worms for this originally, I probably wouldn't have
> been in favor of it. My understanding was that 2.0.10 became 2.1.0 and
> more changes would follow on 2.x since we moved out 3.0.
> 

I agree with Brian.  However tempting to have more features creep in 
because of the new dot release (as opposed to dot dot) it's better to 
release a stable version (on which there is now a consensus that it has 
sufficiently evolved from 2.0.x branch) and focus on next release.

Release early, release often ... etc :-)

Cheers


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org