maven-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul Benedict" <pbened...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Maven 2.0.10-RC5
Date Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:40:21 GMT
Is there any chance that because Java 1.4 must be supported, the large
time increase is because of syncronized StringBuffer? Could that be
affecting the aggressive interpolation? I'd like to know what happens
if 1.5 StringBuilder was being used.

Paul

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jason van Zyl <jason@maven.org> wrote:
>
> On 5-Aug-08, at 9:31 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>>
>> Jason,
>>
>> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 9:37:08 am Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you load up CXF and try it with 2.0.9 and and the RC? I will setup
>>> something on Hudson tonight, it collects times so we can check it there.
>>
>> With the profiles that I use to do deploys and stuff (which involves the
>> javadoc and source plugins, but does not execute the tests):   (mvn
>> install -Pdeploy,nochecks)
>>
>> 2.0.9:   9 minutes, 8 seconds
>> 2.0.10-RC5:   18 minutes, 21 seconds
>>
>> That is NOT good and would definitely mean I'm not upgrading.   Also means
>> I
>> cannot recommend pushing 2.0.10 out thoughout the enterprise.   It would
>> definitely annoy too many people.
>>
>
> Thanks for doing that. That's unacceptable and I would consider that a show
> stopper.
>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>> On 5-Aug-08, at 5:01 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 5:54:26 am Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Mauro Talevi
>>>>>
>>>>> <mauro.talevi@aquilonia.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So a 20% increase on the original time - which is acceptable IMO
>>>>>> for the
>>>>>> sake of reproducibility. Certainly not a 300% increase.
>>>>>
>>>>> For me, this might be sufficient reason not to upgrade.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jochen
>>>>
>>>> I have to agree.   My builds are slow enough.   If 2.0.10 makes them
>>>> even
>>>> slower, I'm certainly not going to upgrade.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> dkulp@apache.org
>>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>> Jason van Zyl
>>> Founder,  Apache Maven
>>> jason at sonatype dot com
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
>>>
>>>  -- Unknown
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Jason van Zyl
> Founder,  Apache Maven
> jason at sonatype dot com
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
> business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
> be omnipotent for a while.
>
>  -- Jakob Burckhardt
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org


Mime
View raw message