maven-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul Benedict" <pbened...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Comments / Ideas for MNG-3244
Date Sat, 08 Mar 2008 14:31:27 GMT
I think I've been misunderstood. I am referring to the <configuration>
element that can contain whatever is necessary for configuration. If the
site is generated through a plugin, then by all means, configure the plugin.
See my first response.

Paul

On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Benjamin Bentmann <benjamin.bentmann@udo.edu>
wrote:

> > Why does the configuration option require a bump in version?
>
> The primary place for configurations regarding the build is the POM. A
> new option means a change to the POM schema, a new schema means to bump
> the
> version.
>
> > it is a perfect fit for 2.0.x as well.
>
> Besides, you proposed to break the current behavior by defaulting to "the
> correct way" (btw, "correct" appears to be wrong term here, it's merely a
> matter of supporting different use cases equally easy). Breaking changes
> should not happen for a maintenance release like Maven 2.0.x.
>
>
> Benjamin
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message