Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89813 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2007 20:58:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2007 20:58:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 83646 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2007 20:57:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 83588 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2007 20:57:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Developers List" Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 83577 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2007 20:57:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:57:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [82.209.166.4] (HELO smtp.bredband2.net) (82.209.166.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:57:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 2814 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2007 20:09:13 -0000 Received: from me-5-111-233-83.3.cust.bredband2.com (HELO [192.168.0.3]) ([83.233.111.5]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.bredband2.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Nov 2007 20:09:13 -0000 Message-ID: <4730D534.8030304@apache.org> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:57:24 +0100 From: Dennis Lundberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven-source-plugin 2.0.4 References: <472F9B73.5000907@apache.org> <200711060853.26820.dkulp@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <200711060853.26820.dkulp@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Is any of this reported in JIRA? I have not heard of either of these problems before. Daniel Kulp wrote: > I would have to say -1. > > Compared to 2.0.2 (we were locked down to that version, these problems > may exist there as well): > > 1) MOST IMPORTANT: it's not picking up the remote-resources stuff at > all. Thus, the generated source jars do not have the required > LICENSE/NOTICE files in them. > > 2) All the .svn dirs and files are being added to the source jars. They > didn't with 2.0.2. > > Dan > > > On Monday 05 November 2007, Dennis Lundberg wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to release maven-source-plugin 2.0.4. >> >> This fixes a couple of minor issues. >> The last release was made 6 months ago. >> >> Release Notes: >> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11147&style >> Name=Html&version=13442 >> >> Tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-source-plugin >> -2.0.4/ >> >> Staged at: >> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repository-source-plugin/ >> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours. >> >> >> Here is my +1 > > > -- Dennis Lundberg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org