Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44454 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2006 14:34:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2006 14:34:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 10044 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2006 14:34:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 9972 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2006 14:34:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Maven Developers List" Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 9961 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2006 14:34:07 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 07:34:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 07:34:06 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB346B9DA for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:33:45 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id i4GXt+Fk7Vss for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:33:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from kropotkin.hpl.hp.com (kropotkin.hpl.hp.com [16.25.191.14]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4923E6B9D6 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:33:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kropotkin.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3F0B056 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:33:44 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kropotkin.hpl.hp.com Received: from kropotkin.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kropotkin.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9kTZVhNbSlnV for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:33:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from timmay.hpl.hp.com (timmay.hpl.hp.com [16.25.171.20]) by kropotkin.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F0983A4 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:33:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from [16.25.171.182] (chamonix.hpl.hp.com [16.25.171.182]) by timmay.hpl.hp.com (8.13.2/8.13.2) with ESMTP id k63EXXd1022770 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:33:33 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <44A92ABD.1070609@apache.org> Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:33:33 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us.... References: <83672EAF145CE34B9C75293C33782EDB155CDA@webifymail02.webify.local> <44A6FED1.7050300@exist.com> <44A90BFE.8020904@apache.org> <44A90EE6.8050806@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <44A90EE6.8050806@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPLB-IMAP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the Helpdesk for more information X-HPLB-IMAP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPLB-IMAP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0, required 5) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Brett Porter wrote: > On 3/07/2006 10:22 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: >> I'm kind of busy right now, so am not offering to do this, not until, >> say, September. But otherwise, it would be a really interesting thing >> to work on. Anyone interesting in co-authoring? > > Yep, I've been thinking about these issues for a while (and similar > timeframe for being able to do any sort of work on it). I'd be > interested in writing something on it. OK, we could do something there; latex files in svn as an authoring tool unless you have a better suggestion. > In the mean time, I'd like to see some of the problems and ideas > collated somewhere. I'm hoping some of it is already written down in the > mails I have flagged. > > I'm really keen to see the repository manager up and running as it will > start to give us a better view of the information already in there and > the ability to do some repository-wide analysis. yeah, some httpd stats could be interesting too. Perhaps someone hosting an internal repo could see that. Of course, with caching, you explicitly dont get told whenever something builds against log4j, only when something first pulls it down. There's another reason polling would be interesting I guess; statistics. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org