manifoldcf-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ameya Aware <ameya.aw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Query in Sharepoint connector
Date Wed, 09 Jul 2014 19:33:31 GMT
Hi Karl,

Please find attached solr log file.

Please let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks,
Ameya




On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ameya,
>
> I need to see the solr log output.
>
> Thanks,
> Karl
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please see if you needed below information.
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> Or please let me know where would i get information from.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ameya
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>
>>> Can you include the Solr [INFO] log entry for one of these indexing
>>> actions?  I want to see if last_modified is set incorrectly there.  If you
>>> are running these documents through Solr Cell, it may well be Tika that is
>>> providing the last_modified date, not ManifoldCF.
>>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>
>>>> Please find below screenshot.
>>>>
>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>
>>>> looks like indexing date comes out to be good.
>>>>
>>>> Also, just for your reference pasting my Solr screenshot as well.
>>>>
>>>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ameya
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On second look, it all looks fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> The last thing to check is to look at what is getting set as data.
>>>>> Around line 1996 in SharePointRepository, there is this code:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>                 if (modifiedDate != null)
>>>>>                   data.setModifiedDate(modifiedDate);
>>>>>                 if (createdDate != null)
>>>>>                   data.setCreatedDate(createdDate);
>>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you add this line:
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>                System.out.println("Indexing modified date:
>>>>> "+modifiedDate);
>>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>>
>>>>> ... and recrawl?
>>>>>
>>>>> If that works, we'll have to start looking at Solr.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, looking at your screen shot, it is harder to see for sure
>>>>>> since there are multiple threads active.  So it may well be that
there is
>>>>>> no issue with the parsing.  Let me see if I can confirm that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> how do i open the ticket?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> bq. How is that coming good?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No idea.  It may be a bug in the SimpleDateFormat class
pertaining
>>>>>>>>> to only specific dates.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But then same thing should happen in created date
also , isnt it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How is that coming good?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This shows clearly that the parsing is not doing
the expected
>>>>>>>>>>> thing.  It's not clear why, since it's a pretty
straight usage of
>>>>>>>>>>> SimpleDateFormat, but that is what is going wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please open a ticket for us to look at this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find screenshot below to show modified
date values as
>>>>>>>>>>>> date object and string as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Karl Wright
<
>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ability to parse Microsoft's special
8601 dates is in fact
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already there.  So what might be happening
is a timezone issue, since the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> timezone is not being explicitly set
during parsing.  Printing the value of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> modifiedDateValue will show us if that
is indeed the problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Karl
Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try printing "modifiedDateValue",
in addition to printing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "modifiedDate".  The parsed form
is a date object, not a string.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:20 AM,
Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But created date for all files
is coming good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (modifyDate != null)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   // Item has
a modified date, so we presume
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it exists
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Date modifiedDateValue
=
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date(modifiedDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Date createdDateValue
=
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date(createdDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   System.out.println("Modified
date string
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is: '"+modifiedDate+"'");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   System.out.println("Modify
Date:" +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modifyDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Above code prints out correct
date even after parsing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is the issue coming after
this step??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using Sharepoint 2010.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:10
AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, well SharePoint claims
these dates are ISO8601 dates,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but they are clearly not
in this case.  Here are the tests for 8601 dates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the MCF core code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Date d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("96-11-15T01:32:33.344GMT");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33.344Z");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d = DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33Z");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33+0100");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33-03:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33GMT-03:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33.001-04:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You will note that there
is supposed to be a "T" and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timezone in an ISO-8601 date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What version of SharePoint
are you using, and what is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locale settings for the server
that your SharePoint is running on?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:06
AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find below screenshot
for dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modify Date i added on
my own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Inline image
1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at
11:03 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The SharePoint connector
parses the date.  Can you send
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me some EXAMPLES
of the dates coming back so that I can be sure they will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parse correctly?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014
at 10:59 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I ran the job
and at this point values coming for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modified date
are correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9,
2014 at 10:25 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will provide
instructions for how I'd like you to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> research
this.  I don't suggest running under eclipse for this research.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Around line
1047 in SharePointRepository.java, there is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         
       String modifiedDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Modified");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         
       String createdDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Created");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         
       String guid = values.get("GUID");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         
       String modifyDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Last_x0020_Modified");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please add
this line:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         
      System.out.println("Modified date string
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is: '"+modifiedDate+"'");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please run
the job and send me some examples of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modified
date string.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul
9, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i am
finding it difficult debug the code.. Whatever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
i do,i just build from scratch and check if changes are done or not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you
help me with how can i debug this code? (i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
eclipse IDE)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed,
Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other
users have had no trouble with this attribute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
the past.  SharePoint, though, has been known to use non-ISO-8601-format
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dates
in some cases.  I wonder if this is one of those cases?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
order to determine this, you will need to edit the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code
for the SharePoint connector and add debugging output.  Are you in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> position
to do that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On
Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am seeing Shared documents from Sharepoint.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
There is no difference in treatment between created
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
date and modified date that I can find in the connector.  Can you tell me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
what kind of SharePoint entity you are seeing this on?  Eg documents, list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
items, attachments?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent from my Windows Phone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From: Ameya Aware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent: 7/8/2014 3:41 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To: Karl Wright
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Subject: Re: Query in Sharepoint connector
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 I did not get you properly. Please see below if it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
satisfies your query.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Last modified is date field in Sharepoint. When i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
run job and send metadata to Solr, the date which is being sent to Solr is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
far different than that of it is in Sharepoint.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please let me know if you need any more details.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What does this field look like in SharePoint?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent from my Windows Phone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From: Ameya Aware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent: 7/8/2014 1:50 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To: dev@manifoldcf.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Subject: Query in Sharepoint connector
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Last_modified metadata sent from Sharepoint to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Solr is not giving correct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
values.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Even last_modified showing lesser value than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
created_by date. (Created_by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
date is coming good).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is this bug?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message