Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-connectors-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57383 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 17:26:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 17:26:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 89329 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 17:26:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-connectors-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89252 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 17:26:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact connectors-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89244 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 17:26:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:26:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.99.204.11] (HELO ctsingvcsxia.cts.com) (203.99.204.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:26:25 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB0D79.2BB38951" Subject: RE: Other document data. Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:57:18 +0530 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Other document data. Thread-Index: AcsIekhQmea1t8+iQbi0vhShsxXt+gABtAJPAAGrTJAAAFpgMAApbpzwAFpk7m IAaXKxEAAJznSRAACyz5AAA3EkLwAA111wAC5XCMkABfleIAAAmPzAAAEMm1A= References: , , , , From: To: X-imss-version: 2.054 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scanInfo: M:P L:E SM:0 X-imss-tmaseResult: TT:0 TS:0.0000 TC:00 TRN:0 TV:6.0.1038(17436.003) X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:2 C:4 M:4 S:4 R:4 (0.1500 0.1500) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB0D79.2BB38951 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Karl! Thanks! The Metadata for Solr is working! :) The metadata is getting appended. But there is one small problem The date metadata is getting appended like this. org.apache.lcf.core.interfaces.TimeMarker@1d61ee4 Thanks & Regards, Rohan G Patil Cognizant Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91 9535577001 Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com -----Original Message----- From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 5:46 PM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. Do your LCF processes have write access to D:\LCF_App\LCF_Sync? There are a number of Windows bugs having to do with file locking, and it= is possible you are tripping over one of them. I suggest the following: - shut down tomcat and the AgentRun process - see if you can delete the file= D:\LCF_App\LCF_Sync\737\563\lock-_Cache_JOBSTATUSES.lock - if you can't delete it, reboot your system - erase everything under D:\LCF_App\LCF_Sync - start tomcat and the AgentRun process again It's exactly this kind of problem that is driving me to want to use= something like zookeeper for cross-process lock management, rather than= the file system. Karl -----Original Message----- From: ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [mailto:Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 7:56 AM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. Hi Karl! I am currently checking it out. And meanwhile I am getting this error [2010-06-15 19:03:28,996]WARN Attempt to set file lock= 'D:\LCF_App\LCF_Sync\737\563\lock-_Cache_JOBSTATUSES.lock' failed: Access= is denied java.io.IOException: Access is denied at java.io.WinNTFileSystem.createFileExclusively(Native Method) at java.io.File.createNewFile(File.java:883) at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockObject.grabFileLock(LockObject.java:55= 0) at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockObject.leaveReadLock(LockObject.java:4= 89) at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockManager.leaveReadLock(LockManager.java= :752) at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockManager.leaveLocks(LockManager.java:12= 16) at= org.apache.lcf.core.cachemanager.CacheManager.leaveCache(CacheManager.java= :660) at= org.apache.lcf.core.cachemanager.CacheManager.findObjectsAndExecute(CacheM= anager.java:179) at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.Database.executeQuery(Database.java:167) at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.DBInterfacePostgreSQL.performQuery(DBInterfac= ePostgreSQL.java:774) at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.BaseTable.performQuery(BaseTable.java:244) at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.jobs.Jobs.deletingJobsPresent(Jobs.java:1753) at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.jobs.JobManager.getNextDeletableDocuments(JobManage= r.java:807) at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.system.DocumentDeleteStufferThread.run(DocumentDele= teStufferThread.java:103) [2010-06-16 06:29:38,668]ERROR Couldn't write to lock file; disk may be= full. Shutting down process; locks may be left dangling. You must= cleanup before restarting. java.io.FileNotFoundException:= D:\LCF_App\LCF_Sync\737\563\lock-_Cache_JOBSTATUSES.file (Access is= denied) at java.io.FileOutputStream.open(Native Method) at java.io.FileOutputStream.(FileOutputStream.java:179) at java.io.FileOutputStream.(FileOutputStream.java:131) at java.io.FileWriter.(FileWriter.java:73) at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockObject.writeFile(LockObject.java:732) at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockObject.enterReadLockNoWait(LockObject.= java:449) at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockObject.enterReadLock(LockObject.java:4= 01) at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockManager.enterLocks(LockManager.java:92= 4) at= org.apache.lcf.core.cachemanager.CacheManager.enterCache(CacheManager.java= :278) at= org.apache.lcf.core.cachemanager.CacheManager.findObjectsAndExecute(CacheM= anager.java:98) at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.Database.executeQuery(Database.java:167) at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.DBInterfacePostgreSQL.performQuery(DBInterfac= ePostgreSQL.java:774) at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.BaseTable.performQuery(BaseTable.java:244) at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.jobs.Jobs.activeJobsPresent(Jobs.java:1770) at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.jobs.JobManager.getNextDocuments(JobManager.java:14= 90) at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.system.StufferThread.run(StufferThread.java:157) What must be the problem ? Thanks & Regards, Rohan G Patil Cognizant Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91 9535577001 Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com -----Original Message----- From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:34 PM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. A fix was checked in yesterday for the missing "literal." in all metadata= field names. Is this fix working for you? Karl ________________________________________ From: ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:04 AM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. Hi, Yes the metadata is sent to solr. But it is being sent like this. webapp=3D/solr path=3D/update/extract params=3D{fmap.content= =3Dtext&DDOCAUTHOR=3Dsysadmin&uprefix=3Dattr_&literal.id= =3D/idc/groups/public/documents/sunil_layout/mfe001251.xml&lowernames= =3Dtrue&captureAttr=3Dtrue} as you can see DDOCAUTHOR is sent in the params part which is a custom= metadata. But to add custom data as metadata in Solr we should pass in the literal= parameter along with the file. So, there will be a small change in the code. Instead of sending the column name in the params, we should send literal.<> (columnnames in small case) Thanks & Regards, Rohan G Patil Cognizant Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91 9535577001 Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com -----Original Message----- From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:03 PM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. That's hard to determine without looking at the solr logs. I am not= familiar with the log options available, but unless I'm mistaken the= default configuration should be dumping every request to standard out. Karl ________________________________________ From: ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 5:23 AM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. Hi, Yes I get it. Thanks for the clarification. I was doing the similar thing before and it used to run, now it didn't. So= I got confused. Is there any way to check if metadata is actually sent to solr? Because I= am experiencing some problem there and I don't seem to figure out where it= is going wrong. Thanks & Regards, Rohan G Patil Cognizant Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91 9535577001 Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com -----Original Message----- From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:13 PM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. LCF is an incremental crawler. The version query is used to determine= whether data needs to be refetched and reindexed. If it returns the same= thing each time the document is examined, the data query will not be run= the second time. I therefore suggest either the following: (1) Supply no version query at all. That signals to the connector that= there is no version information and the data must be reindexed on every= job run. (2) Supply a version query that properly reflects changes to the data. For= instance, if there's a timestamp in each record, you can use that by= itself ONLY if any metadata changes also are associated with a change in= that timestamp. If not, you will need to glom the metadata into the= version string as well as the timestamp. Is this understood? If you want to FORCE a reindex, there is a link in the crawler-ui for the= output connection which allows you to force reindexing of all data= associated with that connection. If this still doesn't seem to describe what you are seeing, please clarify= further. Thanks, Karl ________________________________________ From: ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:51 AM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. Hi, When we specify the metadata content, It runs fine the first time, The= second time it doesn't run the data query at all. What must be the problem= ? Thanks & Regards, Rohan G Patil Cognizant Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91 9535577001 Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com -----Original Message----- From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com] Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 7:04 AM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. No. The data query (the same one that returns the blob info) can now= include additional columns. These columns will be sent to Solr as= metadata fields. Karl ________________________________________ From: ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com] Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 2:28 AM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. Hi, I see that the issue is resolved. Now is there a new query where in we can specify the metadata fields ? Thanks & Regards, Rohan G Patil Cognizant Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91 9535577001 Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com -----Original Message----- From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 4:12 PM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. It is not possible to properly glom other fields onto a BLOB unless you= know that the blob's contents are always encoded text. So I suggest you= create a jira enhancement request in the Lucene Connector Framework= project to describe this enhancement (adding metadata support to JDBC= connector). The url is: http://issues.apache.org/jira You may need to create an account if you don't already have one. Let me= know if you have any difficulties. Thanks, Karl -----Original Message----- From: ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [mailto:Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 6:39 AM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. Hi, Using solution 1 was not a bad idea, but the problem is the content is= stored as BLOB in the database and gluing other fields with BLOB is not= possible (Is it ?) . Regarding 2 : Yes I guess I can do that modification, and anyway it all= depends on how we show it to the user. Thanks & Regards, Rohan G Patil Cognizant Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91 9535577001 Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com -----Original Message----- From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:19 PM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Other document data. (1) The JDBC connector is currently relatively primitive and does not have= any support for "document metadata" at this time. You can, of course,= glom together multiple fields into the content field with it, but that's= pretty crude. (2) The LCF convention for how to identify documents uniquely in the target= index is to use the URL of the document. All documents indexed with LCF= have such a URL and it is likely to be both useful and unique. This url= is how LCF requests deletion of the document from the index, if necessary,= and also overwrites the document. So it maps pretty precisely to= literal.id for the basic solr setup. Now, it may be that this is too tied= to the example, and that the solr connector should have a configuration= setting to allow the name of the id field used to be changed - that sounds= like a reasonable modification that would not be too difficult to do. Is= this something you are looking for? Karl ________________________________________ From: ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 4:52 AM To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Other document data. I am using JDBC connection to search for the documents in the database. The issue is some document data(Check in date etc) is present in the other= columns. How to send this data to Solr so as to index it. Why is the URL of the file taken as ID in Solr. Thanks & Regards, Rohan G Patil Cognizant Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91 9535577001 Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of=20 the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged=20 information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by=20 reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding,=20 printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this=20 e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB0D79.2BB38951 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: Other document data.

Hi Karl!

Thanks! The Metadata for Solr is working!= :)

The metadata is getting appended. But there is one small= problem

The date metadata is getting appended like= this.

org.apache.lcf.core.interfaces.TimeMarker@1d61ee4

Than= ks & Regards,
Rohan G Patil
Cognizant  Programmer Analyst= Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91= 9535577001
Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com


-----Original= Message-----
From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com]
Sent= : Wednesday, June 16, 2010 5:46 PM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.

Do your LCF processes have write access to= D:\LCF_App\LCF_Sync?

There are a number of Windows bugs having to= do with file locking, and it is possible you are tripping over one of= them.
I suggest the following:

- shut down tomcat and the= AgentRun process
- see if you can delete the file= D:\LCF_App\LCF_Sync\737\563\lock-_Cache_JOBSTATUSES.lock
- if you can't= delete it, reboot your system
- erase everything under= D:\LCF_App\LCF_Sync
- start tomcat and the AgentRun process= again

It's exactly this kind of problem that is driving me to want= to use something like zookeeper for cross-process lock management, rather= than the file system.

Karl

-----Original= Message-----
From: ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [mailto:Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 7:56 AM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.


Hi Karl!

I am currently checking it out. And= meanwhile I am getting this error

[2010-06-15= 19:03:28,996]WARN  Attempt to set file lock= 'D:\LCF_App\LCF_Sync\737\563\lock-_Cache_JOBSTATUSES.lock' failed: Access= is denied
java.io.IOException: Access is= denied
        at= java.io.WinNTFileSystem.createFileExclusively(Native= Method)
        at= java.io.File.createNewFile(File.java:883)
     = ;   at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockObject.grabFileLock(LockObject.java:55= 0)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockObject.leaveReadLock(LockObject.java:4= 89)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockManager.leaveReadLock(LockManager.java= :752)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockManager.leaveLocks(LockManager.java:12= 16)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.cachemanager.CacheManager.leaveCache(CacheManager.java= :660)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.cachemanager.CacheManager.findObjectsAndExecute(CacheM= anager.java:179)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.Database.executeQuery(Database.java:167)
&= nbsp;       at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.DBInterfacePostgreSQL.performQuery(DBInterfac= ePostgreSQL.java:774)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.BaseTable.performQuery(BaseTable.java:244)        at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.jobs.Jobs.deletingJobsPresent(Jobs.java:1753)
&n= bsp;       at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.jobs.JobManager.getNextDeletableDocuments(JobManage= r.java:807)
        at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.system.DocumentDeleteStufferThread.run(DocumentDele= teStufferThread.java:103)
[2010-06-16 06:29:38,668]ERROR Couldn't write= to lock file; disk may be full.  Shutting down process; locks may be= left dangling.  You must cleanup before= restarting.
java.io.FileNotFoundException:= D:\LCF_App\LCF_Sync\737\563\lock-_Cache_JOBSTATUSES.file (Access is= denied)
        at= java.io.FileOutputStream.open(Native= Method)
        at= java.io.FileOutputStream.<init>(FileOutputStream.java:179)
 =        at= java.io.FileOutputStream.<init>(FileOutputStream.java:131)
 =        at= java.io.FileWriter.<init>(FileWriter.java:73)
   &= nbsp;    at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockObject.writeFile(LockObject.java:732)<= BR>        at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockObject.enterReadLockNoWait(LockObject.= java:449)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockObject.enterReadLock(LockObject.java:4= 01)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.lockmanager.LockManager.enterLocks(LockManager.java:92= 4)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.cachemanager.CacheManager.enterCache(CacheManager.java= :278)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.cachemanager.CacheManager.findObjectsAndExecute(CacheM= anager.java:98)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.Database.executeQuery(Database.java:167)
&= nbsp;       at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.DBInterfacePostgreSQL.performQuery(DBInterfac= ePostgreSQL.java:774)
        at= org.apache.lcf.core.database.BaseTable.performQuery(BaseTable.java:244)        at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.jobs.Jobs.activeJobsPresent(Jobs.java:1770)
&nbs= p;       at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.jobs.JobManager.getNextDocuments(JobManager.java:14= 90)
        at= org.apache.lcf.crawler.system.StufferThread.run(StufferThread.java:157)

What must be the problem ?

Thanks & Regards,
Rohan G= Patil
Cognizant  Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91= 9535577001
Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com


-----Original= Message-----
From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com]
Sent= : Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:34 PM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.

A fix was checked in yesterday for the missing "literal." in= all metadata field names.  Is this fix working for= you?

Karl

________________________________________
From:= ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com]
Sent:= Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:04 AM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.

Hi,

Yes the metadata is sent to solr. But it is being= sent like this.

webapp=3D/solr path=3D/update/extract params= =3D{fmap.content=3Dtext&DDOCAUTHOR=3Dsysadmin&uprefix= =3Dattr_&literal.id= =3D/idc/groups/public/documents/sunil_layout/mfe001251.xml&lowernames= =3Dtrue&captureAttr=3Dtrue}

as you can see DDOCAUTHOR is sent in= the params part which is a custom metadata.

But to add custom data= as metadata in Solr we should pass in the literal parameter along with the= file.

So, there will be a small change in the code.

Instead= of sending the column name in the params, we should= send

literal.<<columnname>> (columnnames in small= case)


Thanks & Regards,
Rohan G Patil
Cognizant = Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91= 9535577001
Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com


-----Original= Message-----
From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com]
Sent= : Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:03 PM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.

That's hard to determine without looking at the solr= logs.  I am not familiar with the log options available, but unless= I'm mistaken the default configuration should be dumping every request to= standard= out.

Karl
________________________________________
From: ext= Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com]
Sent: Tuesday,= June 15, 2010 5:23 AM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.

Hi,

Yes I get it. Thanks for the= clarification.

I was doing the similar thing before and it used to= run, now it didn't. So I got confused.

Is there any way to check if= metadata is actually sent to solr? Because I am experiencing some problem= there and I don't seem to figure out where it is going= wrong.


Thanks & Regards,
Rohan G= Patil
Cognizant  Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91= 9535577001
Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com

-----Original= Message-----
From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com]
Sent= : Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:13 PM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.

LCF is an incremental crawler.  The version query is= used to determine whether data needs to be refetched and reindexed. = If it returns the same thing each time the document is examined, the data= query will not be run the second time.  I therefore suggest either= the following:

(1) Supply no version query at all.  That= signals to the connector that there is no version information and the data= must be reindexed on every job run.
(2) Supply a version query that= properly reflects changes to the data.  For instance, if there's a= timestamp in each record, you can use that by itself ONLY if any metadata= changes also are associated with a change in that timestamp.  If not,= you will need to glom the metadata into the version string as well as the= timestamp.  Is this understood?

If you want to FORCE a= reindex, there is a link in the crawler-ui for the output connection which= allows you to force reindexing of all data associated with that= connection.

If this still doesn't seem to describe what you are= seeing, please clarify= further.

Thanks,
Karl

___________________________________= _____
From: ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com= [Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:51= AM
To: connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other= document data.

Hi,

When we specify the metadata content, It= runs fine the first time, The second time it doesn't run the data query at= all. What must be the problem ?

Thanks & Regards,
Rohan G= Patil
Cognizant  Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91= 9535577001
Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com


-----Original= Message-----
From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com]
Sent= : Sunday, June 13, 2010 7:04 AM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.

No.  The data query (the same one that returns the blob= info) can now include additional columns.  These columns will be sent= to Solr as metadata= fields.

Karl

________________________________________
Fro= m: ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com]
Sent:= Friday, June 11, 2010 2:28 AM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.

Hi,

I see that the issue is resolved.

Now is= there a new query where in we can specify the metadata fields= ?

Thanks & Regards,
Rohan G Patil
Cognizant = Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91= 9535577001
Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com


-----Original= Message-----
From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com]
Sent= : Thursday, June 10, 2010 4:12 PM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.

It is not possible to properly glom other fields onto a BLOB= unless you know that the blob's contents are always encoded text.  So= I suggest you create a jira enhancement request in the Lucene Connector= Framework project to describe this enhancement (adding metadata support to= JDBC connector).

The url is: http://issues.apache.org/jira
You may need to create an account if you don't already have one.  Let= me know if you have any= difficulties.

Thanks,
Karl


-----Original= Message-----
From: ext Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [mailto:Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 6:39 AM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.


Hi,

Using solution 1 was not a bad idea, but the= problem is the content is stored as BLOB in the database and gluing other= fields with BLOB is not possible (Is it ?) .

Regarding 2 : Yes I= guess I can do that modification, and anyway it all depends on how we show= it to the user.

Thanks & Regards,
Rohan G= Patil
Cognizant  Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91= 9535577001
Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com

-----Original= Message-----
From: karl.wright@nokia.com [mailto:karl.wright@nokia.com]
Sent= : Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:19 PM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Other document= data.

(1) The JDBC connector is currently relatively primitive and= does not have any support for "document metadata" at this time.  You= can, of course, glom together multiple fields into the content field with= it, but that's pretty crude.
(2) The LCF convention for how to identify= documents uniquely in the target index is to use the URL of the= document.  All documents indexed with LCF have such a URL and it is= likely to be both useful and unique.  This url is how LCF requests= deletion of the document from the index, if necessary, and also overwrites= the document.  So it maps pretty precisely to literal.id for the= basic solr setup.  Now, it may be that this is too tied to the= example, and that the solr connector should have a configuration setting= to allow the name of the id field used to be changed - that sounds like a= reasonable modification that would not be too difficult to do.  Is= this something you are looking= for?

Karl
________________________________________
From: ext= Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com [Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com]
Sent: Thursday,= June 10, 2010 4:52 AM
To:= connectors-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Other document= data.

I am using JDBC connection to search for the documents in the= database.

The issue is  some document data(Check in date etc)= is present in the other columns. How to send this data to Solr so as to= index it.

Why is the URL of the file taken as ID in= Solr.

Thanks & Regards,
Rohan G Patil
Cognizant = Programmer Analyst Trainee,Bangalore || Mob # +91= 9535577001
Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com<mailto:Rohan.GPatil@cognizant.com>

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole= use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and= privileged
information.
If you are not the intended recipient,= please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the= original message.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure,= dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying of this email or any= action taken in reliance on this
e-mail is strictly prohibited and may= be unlawful.




This e-mail and any files transmitted with= it are for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain= confidential and privileged
information.
If you are not the intended= recipient, please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all= copies of the original message.
Any unauthorized review, use,= disclosure, dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying of this= email or any action taken in reliance on this
e-mail is strictly= prohibited and may be unlawful.



This e-mail and any files= transmitted with it are for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s)= and may contain confidential and privileged
information.
If you are= not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply e-mail= and destroy all copies of the original message.
Any unauthorized= review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying= of this email or any action taken in reliance on this
e-mail is= strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.



This e-mail and= any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of
the intended= recipient(s) and may contain confidential and= privileged
information.
If you are not the intended recipient,= please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the= original message.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure,= dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying of this email or any= action taken in reliance on this
e-mail is strictly prohibited and may= be unlawful.



This e-mail and any files transmitted with it= are for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain= confidential and privileged
information.
If you are not the intended= recipient, please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all= copies of the original message.
Any unauthorized review, use,= disclosure, dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying of this= email or any action taken in reliance on this
e-mail is strictly= prohibited and may be unlawful.



This e-mail and any files= transmitted with it are for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s)= and may contain confidential and privileged
information.
If you are= not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply e-mail= and destroy all copies of the original message.
Any unauthorized= review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying= of this email or any action taken in reliance on this
e-mail is= strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.



This e-mail and= any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of
the intended= recipient(s) and may contain confidential and= privileged
information.
If you are not the intended recipient,= please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the= original message.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure,= dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying of this email or any= action taken in reliance on this
e-mail is strictly prohibited and may= be unlawful.


This e-mail and any= files transmitted with it are for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this=
e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.


------_=_NextPart_001_01CB0D79.2BB38951--