From dev-return-19452-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@manifoldcf.apache.org Mon Apr 15 11:38:05 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 222D218064C for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:38:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 7832 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2019 11:38:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@manifoldcf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@manifoldcf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@manifoldcf.apache.org Received: (qmail 7690 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2019 11:38:01 -0000 Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (HELO mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:38:01 +0000 Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 10FADE2ABE for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3F9D024595 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:38:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Karl Wright (JIRA)" To: dev@manifoldcf.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-1449) Add support for respecting the NoCrawl flag in Sharepoint MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16817880#comment-16817880 ] Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-1449: ----------------------------------------- Yes, we could use the ListItems method to retrieve the NoCrawl flag for individual listed documents, provided this performs well. If individual metadata requests would need to be made for each listed document, then we'd be better off adding a new method that wraps the metadata retrieval method we're currently using from Lists and adding the NoCrawl attribute to the response. Does this make sense? > Add support for respecting the NoCrawl flag in Sharepoint > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CONNECTORS-1449 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1449 > Project: ManifoldCF > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: SharePoint connector > Reporter: Markus Schuch > Assignee: Markus Schuch > Priority: Major > Fix For: ManifoldCF next > > > There is a flag {{NoCrawl}} in sharepoint that indicates whether an object should be crawled or not: > Lists > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/microsoft.sharepoint.splist.nocrawl.aspx > Web > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/microsoft.sharepoint.spweb.nocrawl.aspx > Field > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/microsoft.sharepoint.spfield.nocrawl.aspx > Wouldn't it be nice to respect that flag? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)