Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-manifoldcf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-manifoldcf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 483AF116F3 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 06:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8566 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2014 06:41:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-manifoldcf-dev-archive@manifoldcf.apache.org Received: (qmail 8517 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2014 06:41:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@manifoldcf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@manifoldcf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@manifoldcf.apache.org Received: (qmail 8509 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2014 06:41:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 May 2014 06:41:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.49.148.33] (HELO graemes.com) (62.49.148.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 21 May 2014 06:41:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 5262 invoked by uid 453); 21 May 2014 06:40:54 -0000 Received: from duke.graemes.com (HELO duke.graemes.com) (192.168.7.2) (smtp-auth username lists, mechanism plain) by graemes.com (qpsmtpd/0.84) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Wed, 21 May 2014 07:40:54 +0100 Message-ID: <537C4A75.3000400@graemes.com> Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 07:40:53 +0100 From: Graeme Seaton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@manifoldcf.apache.org Subject: Re: ManifoldCF 1.6.5 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on graemes.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I would support a release of a 1.6.1 in the next couple of weeks.... Graeme On 19/05/14 12:31, Karl Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > CONNECTORS-938 is a significant issue for those using Java 8. In previous > discussions in this group, we tentatively considered having an interim > point release (e.g. 1.6.1) halfway in the four-month release schedule. > But this would make the point release happen somewhere around June 30th. > Do we want to wait that long to release the fix for CONNECTORS-938? Or > should we move towards releasing a 1.6.1 sometime in the next couple of > weeks? > > Karl >