manifoldcf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Piergiorgio Lucidi <piergior...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Board report
Date Tue, 06 May 2014 14:42:31 GMT
+1 from me ;)

Piergiorgio


2014-05-02 15:57 GMT+02:00 Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>:

> Here's my proposed May report.
>
> [REPORT] ManifoldCF
>
> Board Report, ManifoldCF PMC
>
> ManifoldCF PMC Chair: Karl Wright (kwright@apache.org)
> Date: May 2014
>
> Project description
> ==============
>
> ManifoldCF is an effort to provide an open source framework for connecting
> source content repositories like Microsoft Sharepoint and EMC Documentum,
> to target repositories or indexes, such as Apache Solr, OpenSearchServer
> or ElasticSearch. ManifoldCF also defines a security model for target
> repositories
> that permits them to enforce source-repository security policies.
>
> Releases
> ========
>
> ManifoldCF graduated from the Apache Incubator on May 16, 2012.  Since
> then, there
> have been seven major releases, including a 1.6 release on April 30, 2014.
>
> Committers and PMC membership
> =============================
>
> The last committer and PMC member we signed up was Graeme Seaton (graemes),
> on March
> 2, 2014.  Other contributors have been approached, but have also declined
> to accept
>
> consideration for possible committership.  The most recent of these
> encounters took
>
> place in September, 2013.
>
>
> Mailing list activity
> =====================
>
> Mailing list has been active, with a wide range of topics.  Most of our
> connectors
> now have significant use cases and constituencies, and the connector family
> continues
> to grow.  Dev list comments for this period centered around voting for the
> major 1.5
> release, people looking for integration advice, etc.
>
> Committer and external contributions have been significant this cycle.  I
> am unaware
> of any mailing-list question that has gone unanswered.
>
> Outstanding issues
> ==================
>
> None known.
>
> Branding
> ========
>
> We have reviewed the site branding guidelines and believe we are now
> compliant with
> these, with the possible exception of (TM) signs in logos from other Apache
> products
> that don't have any such marks.  Hopefully we will be able to correct this
> issue
> soon.
>
>
> Please let me know of any problems with this.
>
> Karl
>
> --
> Piergiorgio Lucidi
> Open Source ECM Specialist
> http://www.open4dev.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message