mahout-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: matrix inversion in plan ?
Date Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:25:01 GMT
That isn't enough detail.

How do you mean to compute degrees of freedom?  WHy do you need the inverse
to do this?

Where did you get this algorithm?

Is this even appropriate at large scale?

Is this a stable computation?



On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 11:18 PM, go canal <gocanal@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

> I will be more than interested to extend to complex double, when the
> solver is ready for double data type.  thanks, canal
>
>
>      On Monday, October 5, 2015 2:02 PM, Ted Dunning <
> ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>  On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 10:32 PM, go canal <gocanal@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > in fact i need to support both double and complex double for either
> > distributed memory based or out-of-core.
>
>
> Ahh...
>
> Well Mahout doesn't support complex anything. So this isn't going to help
> you.
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message