Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-mahout-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-mahout-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB4D710457 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 03:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40858 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2014 03:54:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mahout-user-archive@mahout.apache.org Received: (qmail 40767 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2014 03:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@mahout.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@mahout.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@mahout.apache.org Received: (qmail 40753 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2014 03:54:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 03:54:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.179] (HELO mail-ie0-f179.google.com) (209.85.223.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 03:54:28 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id lx4so434297iec.24 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 20:54:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=4yt2ld8CnCNIDVYFMMcykfyOrRMBl+bG5sd1Z59sGuE=; b=UI9xpYNapcUm4qw6HsgRO2fruegzrqgO+jxuFD6pxIvsYNICMZl4M9+M7uqQxtFQcm SuRSKbCvvJ1q4adIVrR9eMF1+CWwaFIQ88UnsNa73PxdYjpseh7xzmJWm1OjuHgMVNuR thlIPlq4AZzaO8YI0KH9L+4nc1hHdpKN6393/KN864/HFdSvcxXol987fhxKQoGYjw8r XEp0WE0ET85pghoHZGqZuBz/KwHnmTKO+Kd+2nHSiaTWlCFg+byxv/2wLs+BPP/tOpS4 AceKgasPwiM99OF7P2rPnGq0jz+q2ZCKusns5gI812VmOSR1goAwrxO3QE8HGX3+knCA zBgw== X-Received: by 10.50.61.244 with SMTP id t20mr1566682igr.0.1405050843750; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 20:54:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.148.40 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 20:53:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 20:53:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adaptive log.reg. validation To: "user@mahout.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc1ada6f6e4904fde2e49d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bdc1ada6f6e4904fde2e49d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 THis is confusing for sure. The AUC says that you have no predictive power, but the confusion matrix says you have a perfect solution. Can you say more about what you did and what data you used? On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 6:14 AM, fqsbs1 . wrote: > Hi,i have one question.Is validation of adaptive log.reg. bugged becouse i > get this results? > > Log-likelihood:Min=-0.69, Max=-0.69, Mean=-0.69, Median=-0.69 > > AUC = 0.48 > > ======================================================= > Confusion Matrix > ------------------------------------------------------- > a b <--Classified as > 18812 0 | 18812 a = 0 > 0 1187 | 1187 b = 1 > > > > Entropy Matrix: [[-0.7, -0.2], [-0.7, -0.2]] > --047d7bdc1ada6f6e4904fde2e49d--