Mailing-List: contact user-help@mahout.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@mahout.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.42 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates
 10.68.136.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.136.234;
References: <1329548046.88424.androidMobile@web130205.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 <loom.20120221T144858-975@post.gmane.org>
 <1329951319.63336.YahooMailNeo@web130205.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 <loom.20120224T083259-143@post.gmane.org>
 <loom.20120224T140959-144@post.gmane.org>
 <loom.20120227T124503-730@post.gmane.org>
 <46EA2EED-DFB9-4EA9-B5DC-0B23ABFA42AA@gmail.com>
 <loom.20120228T113340-479@post.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20120228T113340-479@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <2AE12675-3E0D-480F-A2F5-CD6E8D9A066C@gmail.com>
Cc: "user@mahout.apache.org" <user@mahout.apache.org>
From: Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Naive-Bayes work flow
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:27:18 -0800
To: "user@mahout.apache.org" <user@mahout.apache.org>

I think that you have an invocation or format bug and you are effectively gi=
ving NB different data you think.=20

Note that this is what is called a stopped clock model. That means it is onl=
y getting correct results by putting out a constant value.=20

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 28, 2012, at 2:58 AM, Naveenchandra <naveenchandravp@gmail.com> wrote=
:

>=20
> Hi Ted,
>    I have not used R, you are saying the poor performance of classifier is=

> because of the less number of records ?
>  I have tried with 50000 records(same for train and test) but the result i=
s
> same, deactive being correctly classified and most of the active to deacti=
ve,
> what range you records you me to give for getting correct result.
> Or it is because of the data ?=20
>=20