Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-mahout-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-mahout-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE90966CC for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6516 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:36:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mahout-user-archive@mahout.apache.org Received: (qmail 6484 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:36:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@mahout.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@mahout.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@mahout.apache.org Received: (qmail 6476 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 17:36:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:36:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.42] (HELO mail-vw0-f42.google.com) (209.85.212.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:36:46 +0000 Received: by vwl1 with SMTP id 1so658719vwl.1 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:36:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=m/B66uUrIj4afU8Ujt+NliOpiPKyCs7a07je0XRjKhc=; b=jYz6y6pZGW5WCXgg68k1On1/w9DH3pFFVrbgKzYwrVjFxeNk4SXuboQHLvA2dbGkS2 w6SoIcSouxhoa6Xmdrmws2V79oKxvVrUWWZisAq6G3fDybtTReISC86SQs3+r1jhYSs3 vYd+w/LcjS1wXYkhEVbd/XLJgavz3aUL35TnI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=NWD+R0C7a4iyaPFZ+GYd1IGimLi8FhCRuXuELapLHV0hs9kmXq6YQSo2xVZF85h3zF sT+Nmg0CUNCk18aLSG97OV5MZJarnG+hGx43gvd32gkjqnBY02AQq+98ZJVaYF+mOeDc X+zo6XNE4KbBYlq2mERy+51Jpyws7zNMyG0CM= Received: by 10.52.172.200 with SMTP id be8mr2229570vdc.48.1308418585050; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:36:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.187.66 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:36:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0iqnv6hajqtss3vm3qci45cfs91rp2o1be@4ax.com> From: Ted Dunning Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:36:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LDA To: user@mahout.apache.org, ian-public@upright.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51ba4b1fabfe404a5fff0cc --bcaec51ba4b1fabfe404a5fff0cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I should add that this would be a cool thing to have if it can be made general enough! On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I don't think that the current LDA could be misused this way, but I > wouldn't be surprised if the current variational code could be adapted to do > it. > > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Ian Upright wrote: > >> Is there any way of doing hierarchical LDA with the LDA implementation in >> Mahout? If so, how would one go about doing it? >> >> Thanks, Ian >> > > --bcaec51ba4b1fabfe404a5fff0cc--