Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-mahout-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-mahout-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA81B4084 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92916 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:55:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mahout-user-archive@mahout.apache.org Received: (qmail 92857 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:55:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@mahout.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@mahout.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@mahout.apache.org Received: (qmail 92849 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:55:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:55:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.42] (HELO mail-vw0-f42.google.com) (209.85.212.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:55:34 +0000 Received: by vwl1 with SMTP id 1so8164623vwl.1 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=5zdiItS/Thy3rU1pkewtYFqdfA/PWz39xw35wXUKekc=; b=LdNXe8un4SkzO4CCl2fHAJNBiplv8XVRCLkmc7uTQi6q2RvsvNK1C5g5VU+ne256gF 2taMt92eNZMOtZri9nS5qL4yKdJ3Az4WUo6dhvOWeBpFTf6aBQFI5RLkZWVQF/V8Emnc VBWEGcDONnArnzm2WAg2ddn4ubsz+7zVdSJ9k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=jahzlY19i/DRCRHsCbe5YQKNoWhWRAAJKwwxsF20/XGwnGBVXx60RZvpyZ0xf/AchQ XmE/EqB7OQWhArAfHjANx2/fB6/8j1Isr7h/3g4opw0uarFFQsRjlfAXM+JK0SVk8d7u cO27ARMudMq9yekvAWUy2OOHSq1ofWJxRiTVg= Received: by 10.52.76.193 with SMTP id m1mr3078999vdw.204.1306857313286; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.110.101 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:54:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 08:54:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What does percentCorrect of CrossFloderLearner mean? To: user@mahout.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec501603bee386404a4946d87 --bcaec501603bee386404a4946d87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Argh.... log-likelihood should approach the percentage of INcorrect answers (negated). On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Xiaobo Gu wrote: > Page 228 of version 7 of Mahout in Action says : > > Log-likelihood has a maximum value of zero and no bound on how far > negative it can go. For highly accurate classifiers, the value of > average log-likelihood should be close to the average percent correct > for the classifier times the number of target categories. > > Average percent correct times the number of target categories is more > than 0, while Log-likelihood is always less than 0, then is the above > statement correct ? > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Xiaobo Gu > wrote: > > Does it mean the percent of records that the model has correctlly > > predicted the target on the validate protion of the data set, then it > > should be between 0 and 1, and the bigger the better performance of > > the model ? > > > > Regards, > > > > Xiaobo Gu > > > --bcaec501603bee386404a4946d87--