Mailing-List: contact user-help@mahout.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@mahout.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.177 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=AZRH2RdABSYbjiI8OsbTLTf1oTdaNz0RYPbn9RA44lhO8OPVblgQ1imqCJ2/rO1ghO
         NzgnWvaHJwBu+4lbpg4ZE8JwnClax7KsU+4bnpAMAMMvQn35zg/LQCH74pUPjP/liwyT
         AS/+biqMlWwtS+GiarFRCQFzx+hh6Q0J/h90w=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinP1QZEEvQWxGB5QUqqHZo+MQsBeA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikunUu3S4R+2JksAj5hDhKrPcjPBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTikrKvw=oECEfcMtonRey81fibgr-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTikMAUAukHVbmv2AYRV2yy8T82jYNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTi=Pb5cfuUhH27v3M67Fh4gbGE0Jyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTi=Y+H7J0VFaeQ+ZVFZZ5jLNhWhgfA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1D8C94B3-A176-475A-A0F0-9F143715E804@apache.org>
 <BANLkTinFKHMnujRRAdBTtaW6ET_bOceWCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTi=6dop8yzP44FrPSWPmXbiJGv40yw@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTinxWLZUk_V4gvPiHDCY981XKLH7CA@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTimvpAAF8rUKuvArUKh_de8Tb+F6Fg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTimR_LQ8pjFErsPbe3ZuB85p_Z0z4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTikH04-8zMcr0o7a=X8aA1QZWjKYHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTinZHXUpy_RKfBP8vUUXaWBpMe83Tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTinP1QZEEvQWxGB5QUqqHZo+MQsBeA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 11:40:17 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=D5gv6krYhpjXR1gCozuTDky-dsg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: LDA from Lucene Indexes
To: user@mahout.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548a067b8751804a277979a

--bcaec548a067b8751804a277979a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Good point.

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Jake Mannix <jake.mannix@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Pipelining is good for abstraction and really bad for performance (in the
> > map-reduce world).
> >
> > My thought is that we could have a multipurpose tool.  Input would be a
> > lucene index and the program would read term vectors or original text as
> > available.  Output would be either sequence file full of text or sequence
> > file full of vectors.
> >
>
> Ok, sure, then this is modifying the lucene.vectors code, not the
> seq2sparse code, right?
>
>  -jake
>

--bcaec548a067b8751804a277979a--