mahout-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Eastman <j...@windwardsolutions.com>
Subject Re: FuzzyKMeans in distributed execution
Date Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:43:37 GMT
Yes, I will. Am working on it now.

On 4/10/11 8:42 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Jeff, did you open an issue for this?
>
> -Grant
>
> On Apr 7, 2011, at 7:01 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
>
>> Yup, something is broken in FuzzyK distributed. Try running DisplayFuzzyKMeans.java.
It shows that the clusters are, in fact, converging in *sequential* mode. If you change the
final Boolean argument to false; however, there are no results! Rather bizarre this has not
been reported before.
>>
>> Try this with DisplayKMeans and both work and produce the same results. You want
to file a JIRA?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jose Fuentes De Frutos [mailto:infjfd00@udc.es]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 2:14 PM
>> To: user
>> Subject: RE: FuzzyKMeans in distributed execution
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, I think the clusters are the same in all clusters-i directories in the distributed
mode of the FuzzyKMeans algorithm.
>>
>>    -----Original Message----- You mean you are seeing the same clusters as clusters-0
in all other clusters-i directories?
>> That would indeed be a huge bug! I will investigate.
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> Lucene Revolution -- Lucene and Solr User Conference
> May 25-26 in San Francisco
> www.lucenerevolution.org
>
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message