Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-mahout-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94081 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 13:07:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 13:07:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 19401 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 13:07:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mahout-user-archive@mahout.apache.org Received: (qmail 19126 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 13:07:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@mahout.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@mahout.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@mahout.apache.org Received: (qmail 19118 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 13:07:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:07:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sbourke@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.170] (HELO mail-wy0-f170.google.com) (74.125.82.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:07:26 +0000 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so5450500wyb.1 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:07:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6VZdzQTc5SkpCgEVgg3KypVDYw1RVIygYowqPsOGT0s=; b=pLvX2o7NoAC8tnJ0J7a47HaIee1eGJdJbYuQ0ZcUK3BI8u/NG3j+McMMhCV2xMy/AB rKLdXPUtBTWB2uaqQb976rOPqD5kGHRKpf7BAeY604BOM96hPMWF6L6p2GDs8zBMspXl 2d5ALxcZu1u6/d9TBgHzR1NrHbtvOv3fx7pdY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=UEQGPy1Nl9wyR3N6/0HxrofyC85Qxfzk1BRChq2rOJi6AlsX/hrvfpIw7TjKx0o6oh wcyt8NbKoJ3rxRVnzTy+HUgzeDioTOIWgSQOPt7CajGre7MiJ4/rkwI3UXQ7AS3ALpWJ ybT9KFG/QvRdidaTE7ruoAZCZK29RL4ENDd8Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.1.149 with SMTP id 21mr47181wed.10.1289221626244; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:07:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.90.199 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 05:07:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CD7F49D.6060400@apache.org> References: <4CD7F49D.6060400@apache.org> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:07:06 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Moving a twitter conversation to the mailing list From: Steven Bourke To: user@mahout.apache.org, ssc@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636499a4b11ae8304948a4de0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636499a4b11ae8304948a4de0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi (sbourke = me) If anyone wants to give a hand helping to incorporate visualizations I'd be interested in getting involved. I know it had a JIRSA somewhere but never really progressed. Some of my colleagues were moaning about mahout because it didn't have something to show pretty clusters etc. On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Sebastian Schelter wrote: > I'm moving a twitter conversation to the mailing list so that it doesn't > vanish in the short-lived microblogging sphere. > > To summarize, @alansaid is looking for an implementation of the > EM-algorithm as described here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Expectation+Maximization. > I could only point him to an unsuccessful implementation of PLSI tried at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-106. While this one worked > for tiny examples, it clearly didn't scale and it had some parts of the > algorithm wrong IMHO. @sbourke tweeted about using it besides scalability > issues but I would clearly discourage anyone from doing this. > > Nevertheless if Alan manages to make this work and scale I think it would > make a very nice contribution to Mahout. I guess we'd be willing to help, so > Alan, if you need support, just ask on dev@. There's also a mahout > hackathon planned in Berlin, maybe that would be a good opportunity work > collaboratively on that implementation. > > --sebastian > --001636499a4b11ae8304948a4de0--