Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20693 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2009 18:36:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2009 18:36:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 9794 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 18:36:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 9731 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 18:36:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mahout-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: mahout-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list mahout-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 9721 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2009 18:36:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:36:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.199] (HELO mail-px0-f199.google.com) (209.85.216.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:36:23 +0000 Received: by pxi37 with SMTP id 37so2812007pxi.20 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:36:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=DF1RRYNZS1ZL3tV+IOG0UT+WK1n6bZ/lzVsgVfLxI2M=; b=H2JrexbCWOZvwOHOIBvy3kBU+6yXaVRUWgumKGkCX9+GhaDQjYsXfumiJ1QqdJeuBo ek9b7bU/WkZ9MPQ2s0hmTrMp8xj5LzpFXDNrFcCAEK8/sA/GQlnlW3GJVBDlcTe5T+9Q V2hub3SbCmTv8wr/CgxVoWtnpqzSxazgA2VzE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=vzDCCaWjDE93sM/GuUH4L2rJ17Vm291ocDUb+FtcoUIdD0D+b6CZd8GxO25Zvhq4Pt ffHUMwwjyK5RLqC8LxGwISbwHLvs2LRDnWgkNKpul7B6kSN4J+WSc1vg2M94r/T1JdbG cdIzngvVS8k0WXRvvb+u5lzj2EhTaIQQrPMOQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.144.12 with SMTP id w12mr2007312wan.32.1259606161200; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:36:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <16d405e0911300323u1b5ec59fm1c8fe24503f53372@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B1180BD.3010208@marc-hofer.de> <16d405e0911300323u1b5ec59fm1c8fe24503f53372@mail.gmail.com> From: Ted Dunning Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:35:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: TU Berlin Winter of Code Project - II. Layer: Preprocessing To: mahout-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367b6bb4cbc87304799ae94e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367b6bb4cbc87304799ae94e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 A friend of mine just evaluated Behemoth and found that it imposed very large memory overheads relative to just using Gate directly. He was unable to find a way to make use of Behemoth and has opted to implement his own distributed Gate architecture. On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Julien Nioche < lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com> wrote: > Why not using Behemoth to deploy your UIMA application on Hadoop? ( > http://code.google.com/p/behemoth-pebble/) > > ... > > Any thoughts on this? > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve --0016367b6bb4cbc87304799ae94e--