Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12857 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2009 11:36:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2009 11:36:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 60824 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2009 11:36:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 60781 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2009 11:36:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mahout-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: mahout-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list mahout-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 60771 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2009 11:36:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:36:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of srowen@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.228] (HELO mail-ew0-f228.google.com) (209.85.219.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:36:27 +0000 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so311416ewy.28 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:36:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4I+gahwu0w0HWZ48lLnScbdg/+5Q9NeYcg/SyUTLh3Y=; b=jb9aH0J4gCCxq593lfTLOzwbnkBOpBPRZR4AwS53HZ+Isa/GV65JkmnhDdOQ4UhMgA nwhMUP3wWuZk5RPUhp13GTnU2Tyof0NWYA9Ir//vJ+JYmxqoIAf6Ejnv3BirPoj2aPik WZwt96wzGTezMs6L6H7oKxqJlLWKTuE44OO4w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iPcPTGHma2zsQIF+J7ETqPUImt+V83WWoVkbw8n56N5eCozA5Xy3et96pNajemhe7w n6gl0a7jO1TzUEMHnwzz1yDu4yiZrT8+UYli/0BZBDp6UBUDHDvRYsZa10KqY2HQimJg NtuIc2c+q5EtmoXmKPpwCkuoAoLrmD2X62MIc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.0.136 with SMTP id 8mr122116web.111.1253187367362; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:36:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6475fa040909170431k3ea804ffoe7f48c5ab18bad49@mail.gmail.com> References: <6475fa040909170036u24a49a76id8e7f531ef07abbd@mail.gmail.com> <20090917112307.2803a0dd@strausberg.neofonie.priv> <6475fa040909170431k3ea804ffoe7f48c5ab18bad49@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:36:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some basic introductory questions From: Sean Owen To: mahout-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FWIW I do agree that, in the end, the project should be a little more user-friendly. Right now you see it offers the raw machinery for running these processes, without much abstraction on top. I think the project can and will both unify how it exposes this machinery, and work to offer higher-level wrappers on top. That is to say I don't think you missed anything or asked a dumb question! On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Aleksander Stensby wrote: > Okay, thanks Isabel! > That was what I thought, I just wanted to check if I had missed something > important here:)