Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18061 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 22:53:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 22:53:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 5985 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:53:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 5939 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:53:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mahout-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: mahout-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list mahout-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 5929 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 22:53:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:53:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.197] (HELO mail-yx0-f197.google.com) (209.85.210.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:53:34 +0000 Received: by yxe35 with SMTP id 35so295235yxe.29 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:53:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=vfD1/GV71i7+bkZpO7Kxq07cQ61eReiMAtQXBLVrUEg=; b=YanIXYjRCOcW54X0Eze7kzrESaErDBe5AM4t4t6iCBAM7171JP8YUOJHiq/7/yT+Kl FHQyCct5B1DJGMLICfdDdqp5UFLsdB7KFIdaRgWiMd555tz2u8Hzwkc0KZwlamFZ5cGb DNYWHSmEi/Dzvid8XeUvxfJNfK9xx7ddMatqo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=UHa6WYxniZNM7sQxZbrjFi7Kyni5zrRVxFIWAbvX3H4PawcKT+bHJEdDB8nS5GQzLD p59w2ni36ayXhHJKraXTmH4bCWy0M/g+3uN+zYulNJAuwoE7ytzie0EKSGSRfEtmqJkX uC+NX8AMBkgMY1VCp98JvE9Xg5TtvtBxXUN34= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.137.16 with SMTP id k16mr4137801ybd.61.1247266394076; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:53:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <85d3c3b60907101550v4f843090ka9f69f1143ab4897@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A5703F8.8050603@mufin.com> <4A57319F.5090008@mufin.com> <85d3c3b60907101248p49b36dcau5cb54fec13fa1a1f@mail.gmail.com> <85d3c3b60907101550v4f843090ka9f69f1143ab4897@mail.gmail.com> From: Ted Dunning Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:52:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Memory and Speed Questions for Item-Based-Recommender To: mahout-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd30f4e5bf59a046e61d65e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd30f4e5bf59a046e61d65e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hmmm.... don't hold your breath. I will see if I have some time. Is there somebody who would like to meet for a hackathon on this? I could put in 4-6 hours on a weekend. If somebody else would contribute the polish time after that, we could probably have a very nice example out of this. On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Jason Rutherglen < jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't have any > experience with the item-item matrix part so working on an example will > help > me understand it better. Showing the Lucene part may help others who work > along these lines. > --000e0cd30f4e5bf59a046e61d65e--