mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Date Fri, 14 Apr 2017 04:31:06 GMT
If we can get a quorum tomorrow morning Pacific let's get whoever can join
on a hangout; I'll keep an eye on this thread and set up a hangout when we
have a good time.

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:02 AM Andrew Musselman <andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'll leave the artifacts up there in case that helps troubleshooting,
> otherwise let me know and I'll drop them.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll look for you online later today for the hangout.
>>
>> Is there a reason we have the project.version only in the viennacl-omp
>> artifact block for the viennacl profile?
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap.dev@outlook.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, We have 2 new modules each which builds with a profile `viennacl`
>>> and `viennacl-omp`
>>>
>>>
>>> - the `viennacl` profile builds for both modules `viennacl` and
>>> `viennacl-omp`
>>>
>>> - we are trying to build and release for both modules
>>>
>>> - yesterday Andrew and I (without my keys in .m2 to ensure I didnt writ
>>> over anything) both tried to do this with
>>>
>>>
>>>     `mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
>>> release:prepare release:perform`
>>>
>>>
>>> After doing that, the release came up with out the jars for both new
>>> modules:
>>>
>>>  - mahout-native-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar
>>>
>>>  - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar.
>>>
>>>
>>> With the -Pviennacl  the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP,
>>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as
>>> well.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Suneel Marthi <smarthi@apache.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM
>>> To: mahout
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>>
>>> I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check - on
>>> flights today - will only be available late night
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla
>>> > (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will allow
>>> > users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will suffice.
>>> >
>>> > There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in
>>> > distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should know
>>> > better.
>>> >
>>> > We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same
>>> page.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks Suneel and Stevo.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <sslavic@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > If I understood problem and goal well:
>>> > > - module with native code has to be included in the release
>>> > > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published but
>>> > > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging
>>> binary/jar
>>> > etc.
>>> > > and
>>> > > -- distribution module should include sources of module with native
>>> code
>>> > > too
>>> > > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources
>>> > distribution,
>>> > > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything
>>> including
>>> > > their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
>>> > >
>>> > > This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
>>> > >
>>> > > Kind regards,
>>> > > Stevo Slavic.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <smarthi@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or
being
>>> > > > shadowed ?  i can take a look later tonight.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>>> > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands
>>> the
>>> > > fine
>>> > > > > points of making things like this works?
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
>>> > > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <
>>> ap.dev@outlook.com
>>> > >
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
>>> > > release:prepare
>>> > > > > >> release:perform
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> ________________________________
>>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap.dev@outlook.com>
>>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
>>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release
Candidate
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression.
  My
>>> > guess
>>> > > > is
>>> > > > > >> that they were missing before.  I think that this
may have
>>> > something
>>> > > > to
>>> > > > > do
>>> > > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release
time.
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> ________________________________
>>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
>>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
>>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release
Candidate
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before,
do you know?
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <
>>> > ap.dev@outlook.com>
>>> > > > > >> wrote:
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from
the binary
>>> distro:
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > bin
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > conf                            mahout-math-0.13.0.jar
>>> derby.log
>>> > > > > >> >              mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar
docs
>>> > > > > >> >     mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
>>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
>>> > > > > >> >  mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar
h2o
>>> > > > > >> >      mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
>>> > > > > >> >  metastore_db LICENSE.txt                 
   NOTICE.txt
>>> > > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar      README.md
>>> > > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
>>> > > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar          viennacl-omp
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > ________________________________
>>> > > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
>>> > > > > >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release
Candidate
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build
with passing
>>> tests
>>> > > for
>>> > > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala
>>> example in
>>> > > the
>>> > > > > >> binary
>>> > > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw
the GPU get
>>> exercised
>>> > > > when
>>> > > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and
saw all cores
>>> on
>>> > the
>>> > > > CPU
>>> > > > > >> get
>>> > > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile
from source.
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman
<
>>> > > > > >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of
Apache Mahout.
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72
hours and will be
>>> > closed
>>> > > on
>>> > > > > >> > Friday,
>>> > > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at
least 3 PMC +1
>>> binding
>>> > > votes
>>> > > > > >> > (whichever
>>> > > > > >> > > occurs earlier).  Please download, test
and vote with
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0
release of Apache
>>> > > Mahout
>>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
>>> > > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official
0.13.0 release of
>>> > > Apache
>>> > > > > >> Mahout,
>>> > > > > >> > > because...
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > > Maven staging repo:
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > > *
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
>>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
>>> > > > > >> > > <
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
>>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
>>> > > > > >> > >*
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message