mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.10.0 Release
Date Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:25:02 GMT
Thanks everyone. We have had 5  +1 votes from the PMC and this release has
passed and the Voting officially closes.
Will send a formal release announcement once the release is finalized.

Thanks again.

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com> wrote:

> Just built an external app using sbt against the staging repo and it looks
> good to me
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap.dev@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> After testing examples locally from .tar and .zip distribution and testing
> the staged mahout-math artifact in a java application, I am happy with this
> release.
>
> +1 (binding)
> On 04/11/2015 11:45 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> > After checking the {source} * {tar,zip} and running a few tests locally,
> I
> > am fine with this release.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> After checking the binary tarball and zip, and running through all the
> >> examples on an EMR cluster, I am good with this release.
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ah... forgot this.
> >>>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I downloaded and tested the signatures and check-sums on
> >> {binary,source}
> >>> x
> >>>> {zip,tar} + pom.  All were correct.
> >>>>
> >>>> One thing that I worry a little about is that the name of the artifact
> >>>> doesn't include "apache".  Not sure that is a hard requirement, but
it
> >>>> seems a good thing to do.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Here's a new Mahout 0.10.0 Release Candidate at
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1007/
> >>>>> The Voting for this ends on tomorrow.  Need atleast 3 PMC +1 for
the
> >>>>> release to pass.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Grant, Ted:  Would appreciate if u guys could verify the signatures.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rest: Please test the artifacts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks to all the contributors and committers.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Suneel
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Ran well but we have a packaging problem with the binary distro.
> >> Will
> >>>>>> require either a pom or code change I think, hold the vote.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> >>>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Running on EMR now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> I can't run it (due to messed up dev machine) but I verified
the
> >>>>>> artifacts
> >>>>>>> buildiing an external app with sbt using the staged repo
instead
> >> of
> >>> my
> >>>>>>> local .m2 cache. This means the Scala classes were resolved
> >>> correctly
> >>>>>> from
> >>>>>>> the artifacts.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hope someone can actually run it on a cluster
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> >> suneel.marthi@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Please find the Mahout 0.10.0 release candidate at
> >>>>>>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1005/
> >>>>>>> The Voting runs till Saturday, April 11 2015, need atleast
3 PMC
> >> +1
> >>>>> votes
> >>>>>>> for the candidate release to pass.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks again to all the commiters and contributors for their
hard
> >>> work
> >>>>>> over
> >>>>>>> the past few weeks.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Suneel
> >>>>>>> On Behalf of Apache Mahout Team
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message