mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited)
Date Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:23:28 GMT
This is so awesome.

i think i need to re(move) issues links from scala spark bindings page and
just point to this page. Perhaps it is good to add the links to the jiras,
at least for WIP entries

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap.dev@outlook.com> wrote:

> aha.. yes.. Fixed it.. thx.  and please do feel free to hack away at any
> content/organization that you see fit.  I've tried to give a good
> description of  Math-Scala/DSL all in one section.
>
> thx
>
> > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:01:00 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited)
> > From: dlieu.7@gmail.com
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >
> > awesome
> >
> > (typo in "Collaborative filtering" (have i spelled it right?) :)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap.dev@outlook.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > ok, committed here:
> > >
> > >     http://mahout.apache.org/users/basics/algorithms.html
> > >
> > > thx
> > >
> > > > From: ap.dev@outlook.com
> > > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > > Subject: RE: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited)
> > > > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:49:15 -0400
> > > >
> > > > Thank you guys for the feedback! I'll just commit the reorganized
> page
> > > in place of the current "List of Algorithms" page as is and the
> experts on
> > > each section can have at it / reorganize as they see fit.
> > > >
> > > > I know that this page is not a big deal but my goal is to clarify-
> not
> > > confuse- so I really appreciate the eyes!
> > > >
> > > > Another concern is that the page did not reflect the Hierarchical
> design
> > > of the new code.. ie. the Engine-bindings inheriting from and
> optimizing
> > > math-scala, which I think is a huge Mahout strong point.  Maybe that
> is for
> > > another page...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the comments, Thejas...
> > > > > > > I guess another thing that could be added would be (needs
> > > > > > > development) so that developer can dig in and start working.
> > > >
> > > > this is a good idea but might clutter the page,  Instead maybe we can
> > > make it known that anything (non- MR) without a marker "needs
> > > development".  Then maybe an explanation/link from the "How to
> Contribute
> > > page" regarding this fact.
> > > >
> > > > > > > I think this is a very clear, and another thing we can
add is
> maybe
> > > > > > > a link to the source code of the algorithm or an
> example/tutorial.
> > > >
> > > > I like this idea very much- maybe moving the doc links over to the
> algo
> > > column and then having the markers link to directly to the github
> source.
> > > The only problem i can think of here is that eg.  "Item-Based
> Collaborative
> > > Filtering" has docs for both MapReduce and Spark, and in the future
> this
> > > may occur more often- though with the legacy status of MapReduce and
> the
> > > recent abstraction of CLI drivers, probably won't.
> > > >
> > > > It would be nice to have another dimension to work in.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again,
> > > >
> > > > Andy
> > > >
> > > > From: ap.dev@outlook.com
> > > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > > Subject: RE: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited)
> > > > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:46:34 -0400
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you guys for the feedback! I'll just commit the reorganized
> page
> > > in place of the current "List of Algorithms" page as is and the
> experts on
> > > each section can have at it / reorganize as they see fit.
> > > >
> > > > I know that this page is not a big deal but my goal is to clarify-
> not
> > > confuse- so I really appreciate the eyes!
> > > >
> > > > Another concern is that the page did not reflect the Hierarchical
> design
> > > of the new code.. ie. the Engine-bindings inheriting from and
> optimizing
> > > math-scala, which I think is a huge Mahout strong point.  Maybe that
> is for
> > > another page...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the comments, Thejas...
> > > > > > > I guess another thing that could be added would be (needs
> > > > > > > development) so that developer can dig in and start
> working.this
> > > is a good idea but might clutter the page,  Instead maybe we can make
> it
> > > known that anything (non- MR) without a marker "needs development".
> Then
> > > maybe an explanation/link from the "How to Contribute page" regarding
> this
> > > fact.
> > > >
> > > > > > > I think this is a very clear, and another thing we can
add is
> maybe
> > > > > > > a link to the source code of the algorithm or an
> > > example/tutorial.I like this idea very much- maybe moving the doc links
> > > over to the algo column and then having the markers link to directly
> to the
> > > github source.  The only problem i can think of here is that eg.
> > > "Item-Based Collaborative Filtering" has docs for both MapReduce and
> Spark,
> > > and in the future this may occur more often- though with the legacy
> status
> > > of MapReduce and the recent abstraction of CLI drivers, probably won't.
> > > >
> > > > It would be nice to have another dimension to work in.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again,
> > > >
> > > > Andy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:54:09 +0200
> > > > > Subject: Re: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited)
> > > > > From: frank@frankscholten.nl
> > > > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > Great!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Ted Dunning <
> ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo <
> ap.dev@outlook.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Or I can just commit as is and people can have at the
> organization.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sounds good to me!
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message