mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com>
Subject RE: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited)
Date Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:19:21 GMT
aha.. yes.. Fixed it.. thx.  and please do feel free to hack away at any content/organization
that you see fit.  I've tried to give a good description of  Math-Scala/DSL all in one section.

thx

> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:01:00 -0700
> Subject: Re: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited)
> From: dlieu.7@gmail.com
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> 
> awesome
> 
> (typo in "Collaborative filtering" (have i spelled it right?) :)
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap.dev@outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> > ok, committed here:
> >
> >     http://mahout.apache.org/users/basics/algorithms.html
> >
> > thx
> >
> > > From: ap.dev@outlook.com
> > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited)
> > > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:49:15 -0400
> > >
> > > Thank you guys for the feedback! I'll just commit the reorganized page
> > in place of the current "List of Algorithms" page as is and the experts on
> > each section can have at it / reorganize as they see fit.
> > >
> > > I know that this page is not a big deal but my goal is to clarify- not
> > confuse- so I really appreciate the eyes!
> > >
> > > Another concern is that the page did not reflect the Hierarchical design
> > of the new code.. ie. the Engine-bindings inheriting from and optimizing
> > math-scala, which I think is a huge Mahout strong point.  Maybe that is for
> > another page...
> > >
> > > Thanks for the comments, Thejas...
> > > > > > I guess another thing that could be added would be (needs
> > > > > > development) so that developer can dig in and start working.
> > >
> > > this is a good idea but might clutter the page,  Instead maybe we can
> > make it known that anything (non- MR) without a marker "needs
> > development".  Then maybe an explanation/link from the "How to Contribute
> > page" regarding this fact.
> > >
> > > > > > I think this is a very clear, and another thing we can add is
maybe
> > > > > > a link to the source code of the algorithm or an example/tutorial.
> > >
> > > I like this idea very much- maybe moving the doc links over to the algo
> > column and then having the markers link to directly to the github source.
> > The only problem i can think of here is that eg.  "Item-Based Collaborative
> > Filtering" has docs for both MapReduce and Spark, and in the future this
> > may occur more often- though with the legacy status of MapReduce and the
> > recent abstraction of CLI drivers, probably won't.
> > >
> > > It would be nice to have another dimension to work in.
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > > From: ap.dev@outlook.com
> > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited)
> > > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:46:34 -0400
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you guys for the feedback! I'll just commit the reorganized page
> > in place of the current "List of Algorithms" page as is and the experts on
> > each section can have at it / reorganize as they see fit.
> > >
> > > I know that this page is not a big deal but my goal is to clarify- not
> > confuse- so I really appreciate the eyes!
> > >
> > > Another concern is that the page did not reflect the Hierarchical design
> > of the new code.. ie. the Engine-bindings inheriting from and optimizing
> > math-scala, which I think is a huge Mahout strong point.  Maybe that is for
> > another page...
> > >
> > > Thanks for the comments, Thejas...
> > > > > > I guess another thing that could be added would be (needs
> > > > > > development) so that developer can dig in and start working.this
> > is a good idea but might clutter the page,  Instead maybe we can make it
> > known that anything (non- MR) without a marker "needs development".  Then
> > maybe an explanation/link from the "How to Contribute page" regarding this
> > fact.
> > >
> > > > > > I think this is a very clear, and another thing we can add is
maybe
> > > > > > a link to the source code of the algorithm or an
> > example/tutorial.I like this idea very much- maybe moving the doc links
> > over to the algo column and then having the markers link to directly to the
> > github source.  The only problem i can think of here is that eg.
> > "Item-Based Collaborative Filtering" has docs for both MapReduce and Spark,
> > and in the future this may occur more often- though with the legacy status
> > of MapReduce and the recent abstraction of CLI drivers, probably won't.
> > >
> > > It would be nice to have another dimension to work in.
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> > > > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:54:09 +0200
> > > > Subject: Re: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited)
> > > > From: frank@frankscholten.nl
> > > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > >
> > > > Great!
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap.dev@outlook.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Or I can just commit as is and people can have at the organization.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Sounds good to me!
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
 		 	   		  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message