mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Mahout 1.0 goals
Date Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:02:06 GMT
Whatever works


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_marthi@yahoo.com>wrote:

> I believe there was an announcement that went out last month about Apache
> SF embracing github. -
> http://jaxenter.com/apache-ups-github-integration-potential-49460.html
>
> Guess this is more of an INFRA task than anything we need to do (like the
> recent setting up of svnpubsub for future releases).
>
> I can create an INFRA jira and wait for INFRA to take respond.
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 6:03 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> One of my big wishlist items is to move Mahout to Github for workflow and
> community features.
>
> I remember there being discussion a while back but is there any way to move
> our Subversion repo to an Apache Git repo?
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to start a conversation about where we want Mahout to be for
> > 1.0.  Let's suspend for the moment the question of how to achieve the
> > goals.  Instead, let's converge on what we really would like to have
> happen
> > and after that, let's talk about means that will get us there.
> >
> > Here are some goals that I think would be good in the area of numerics,
> > classifiers and clustering:
> >
> > - runs with or without Hadoop
> >
> > - runs with or without map-reduce
> >
> > - includes (at least), regularized generalized linear models, k-means,
> > random forest, distributed random forest, distributed neural networks
> >
> > - reasonably competitive speed against other implementations including
> > graphlab, mlib and R.
> >
> > - interactive model building
> >
> > - models can be exported as code or data
> >
> > - simple programming model
> >
> > - programmable via Java or R
> >
> > - runs clustered or not
> >
> >
> > What does everybody think?
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message