mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Plan for 1.0
Date Thu, 20 Mar 2014 03:53:03 GMT
Here's the link for friday's hangout

https://plus.google.com/events/c6l5kkq8be142uu2fi4o492fe48







On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:38 PM, Frank Scholten <frank@frankscholten.nl> wrote:
 
I can make Friday.



On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:01 PM, peng <pc175@uowmail.edu.au> wrote:

> I have Saturday, Sunday and EDT 1700+.
>
>
> On Wed 19 Mar 2014 12:30:49 PM EDT, Andrew Musselman wrote:
>
>> Friday afternoon Pacific Time is good for me too.
>>
>>  On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:14 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1969@hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm on pacific standard time and am free Sundays late afternoon
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>  On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:13 AM, "Dmitriy Lyubimov" <dlieu.7@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> i am on vacation, so most of the pacific daylight ranges on any day
>>>> should
>>>> work for me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Sebastian Schelter <ssc@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Friday would also work for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  On 03/19/2014 08:05 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same here, travel next week and in Amsterdam the first week of April.
>>>>>>  I
>>>>>> avoid Sundays or weekends for obvious reasons. How bout this Friday?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Mar 19, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Sebastian Schelter <ssc@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would some time on sunday work? I'll be traveling the next two
weeks
>>>>>>> starting from Tuesday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  On 03/19/2014 07:55 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>>>>>>> I had a hangout setup for 0.9, not sure if its still valid; 
I can
>>>>>>>> check on that or can set one up now. When would people wanna
have
>>>>>>>> it?
>>>>>>>> Mondays and Wednesdays don't work for me.  Would Tuesdays
6pm
>>>>>>>> Eastern
>>>>>>>> Time work ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:45 AM, Sebastian Schelter
<
>>>>>>>> ssc@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Saikat,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1) I think that Mahout-1248 and 1249 are still very important
>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>> that I would love to see in the codebase as they would highly
>>>>>>>> improve
>>>>>>>> the usability of our ALS code.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2) I think the last discussion item regarding h2o was to
find a way
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> compare it against existing or spark related algorithm
>>>>>>>> implementation to
>>>>>>>> get a better picture of programming model and performance.
I also
>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>> feel that a final decision has been reached about this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3) We should have the hangout, can someone step up and organize
it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  On 03/19/2014 04:45 AM, Saikat Kanjilal wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>>>>>> I read through the email threads with the weigh ins for
the
>>>>>>>>> inclusion
>>>>>>>>> of H2O as well as spark and wanted to circle back on
the plan for
>>>>>>>>> folks to
>>>>>>>>> meet around 1.0, so a few questions:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1) How does the inclusion of H2O and spark weigh in importance
>>>>>>>>> versus
>>>>>>>>> the current JIRA items that are existing for potentially
new
>>>>>>>>> feature work
>>>>>>>>> to be done in mahout (in my case JIRA 1248/1249)
>>>>>>>>> 2) From reading all the responses it doesn't seem like
there's full
>>>>>>>>> consensus on what the next steps are for h2o and how
that relates
>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>> roadmap around 1.0, please correct me if I'm misunderstanding,
can
>>>>>>>>> someone
>>>>>>>>> outline whether any concrete decisions have been made
on whether
>>>>>>>>> or not
>>>>>>>>> mahout 1.0 will include h2o bindings
>>>>>>>>> 3) Are we moving forward with the google hangout , I
didnt receive
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> anything about this yet
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message