Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mahout.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4FD67614.1060406@windwardsolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:49:56 -0400
From: Jeff Eastman <jdog@windwardsolutions.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Turn on code inspections, please
References: 
 <CAEccTyxeaZxWVwcdd4XTEqzov3=1oS1ub5cs6kW5ZQKbcmv9_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <DCEAAE5B-48F9-4821-B9AE-2226F97571F7@apache.org>
 <CAB+3LJ=nwY=om1tCgbigh-N2Nex0LqheJAjgX6bztscGcBDY=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALhtWkcApM2nHAjqXBkOOAZ6KM4on7Km-ys6cXk=xGu6=O1EAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGRe5hRAbAePVpnE9+DPMwGt-Ot=3vQNyVsdiGP5M89_06ZNaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALhtWkcYkLEF-Y6npqq9v7bMix04Kp0vmyqfL2r1WV2ypn-wPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FD6014F.6070704@windwardsolutions.com>
 <CAPud8Tqr-D9wBTWoda6md=O-ryk3P+KzziwZd7jQk=Vdpas6Pw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPud8Tp-435LBOdZknqSCjS=tCnsu6ZK1C23MW6THZp+6_K4Xg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJwFCa2SNRjqxZB9ar8QjyJUhEtFuf=X6Np4xnEbODTCpDZyoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPud8TpaEdq9dHB5QhYnONUvcF-Wt0R-D+9tFXRjV8vR5KQKOQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPud8TpaEdq9dHB5QhYnONUvcF-Wt0R-D+9tFXRjV8vR5KQKOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------070409010506020104040303"

--------------070409010506020104040303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+1 I feel the same way as Dmitriy


On 6/11/12 6:39 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
> which is why i am saying it would be easier to decouple code tools
> from environment. That is, put them into the build process .
>
>   if we could relax some of the checks on top of it to degree they
> actually agree with sun style autoformatter in eclipse, that would be
> super-great (those are mostly things like spaces in comments and some
> wrapping choices which are for some reason construed differently by
> checkstyle and eclipse styles). I don't think there are many, if,
> perhaps, any at any given checkstyle settings.
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Ted Dunning<ted.dunning@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> I don't want to ignite a flame war since (a) and (b) are sufficient grounds
>> to stay with whatever you like to use, but
>>
>> c) I am not convinced of this
>>
>> d) IntelliJ has a free edition that works great.  You can also get the full
>> version for free for use on open source projects.
>>
>> Like I said, this doesn't change your deep motor training.  I would point
>> out that I have been through more generations of editing environments than
>> I can count over the last 35 years and while it has always been unpleasant
>> to change, changing to the next big thing has generally been worthwhile.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov<dlieu.7@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> And no, i am not ready to part with eclipse yet. a) years of reflexes
>>> hard to beat. b) it is the only environment that has a lot of other
>>> integrations that I use such as StatET (integrated R step-by-step
>>> debugger&  help). c) faster native visuals. d) free.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov<dlieu.7@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Yeah eclipse is a problem. Or checkstyle configuration. or both.
>>>>
>>>> I used to set up the checkstyle plugin that highlights the problems
>>>> but i never managed to get it to 0 since it contradicts sun
>>>> recommended formatting as set in eclipse styles (or even with
>>>> adjustments). So both tools aimed at style actually contradict each
>>>> other on what the right style is. Which tells me both are probably
>>>> overzealous in their assertion since apparently those assertions are a
>>>> subject of contention among authors of those tools.
>>>>
>>>> Eclipse concerns can be partially set aside if the maven build fails
>>>> and reports why it fails so I don't have to check in and wait for
>>>> Jenkins to shove it into my face.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Jeff Eastman
>>>> <jdog@windwardsolutions.com>  wrote:
>>>>> On 6/11/12 7:39 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>>> It may take me a few days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How much do people care about Eclipse integration? Can I ignore that
>>>>>> for the moment?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> -1 No, I think Eclipse integration is important but I will devote some
>>>>> energy to helping here if I can
>


--------------070409010506020104040303--