mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Eastman <>
Subject Re: Turn on code inspections, please
Date Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:49:56 GMT
+1 I feel the same way as Dmitriy

On 6/11/12 6:39 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
> which is why i am saying it would be easier to decouple code tools
> from environment. That is, put them into the build process .
>   if we could relax some of the checks on top of it to degree they
> actually agree with sun style autoformatter in eclipse, that would be
> super-great (those are mostly things like spaces in comments and some
> wrapping choices which are for some reason construed differently by
> checkstyle and eclipse styles). I don't think there are many, if,
> perhaps, any at any given checkstyle settings.
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Ted Dunning<>  wrote:
>> I don't want to ignite a flame war since (a) and (b) are sufficient grounds
>> to stay with whatever you like to use, but
>> c) I am not convinced of this
>> d) IntelliJ has a free edition that works great.  You can also get the full
>> version for free for use on open source projects.
>> Like I said, this doesn't change your deep motor training.  I would point
>> out that I have been through more generations of editing environments than
>> I can count over the last 35 years and while it has always been unpleasant
>> to change, changing to the next big thing has generally been worthwhile.
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov<>  wrote:
>>> And no, i am not ready to part with eclipse yet. a) years of reflexes
>>> hard to beat. b) it is the only environment that has a lot of other
>>> integrations that I use such as StatET (integrated R step-by-step
>>> debugger&  help). c) faster native visuals. d) free.
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov<>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Yeah eclipse is a problem. Or checkstyle configuration. or both.
>>>> I used to set up the checkstyle plugin that highlights the problems
>>>> but i never managed to get it to 0 since it contradicts sun
>>>> recommended formatting as set in eclipse styles (or even with
>>>> adjustments). So both tools aimed at style actually contradict each
>>>> other on what the right style is. Which tells me both are probably
>>>> overzealous in their assertion since apparently those assertions are a
>>>> subject of contention among authors of those tools.
>>>> Eclipse concerns can be partially set aside if the maven build fails
>>>> and reports why it fails so I don't have to check in and wait for
>>>> Jenkins to shove it into my face.
>>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Jeff Eastman
>>>> <>  wrote:
>>>>> On 6/11/12 7:39 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>>> It may take me a few days.
>>>>>> How much do people care about Eclipse integration? Can I ignore that
>>>>>> for the moment?
>>>>> -1 No, I think Eclipse integration is important but I will devote some
>>>>> energy to helping here if I can

  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message