mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Build failed in Jenkins: mahout-nightly #737
Date Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:15:06 GMT
Yeah.. but this is a difference from the correct answer.  I am moderately
sure that this is a problem writing to the temp directory.

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>wrote:

> It's expecting the answer to be 0, but it's some really large value.
> testSingularValues(org.apache.mahout.math.ssvd.SequentialOutOfCoreSvdTest):
> expected:<0.0> but was:<4131200.0000000037>
>
>
> On Dec 28, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> > I think that the answer is 0 because the model is not being read and we
> are
> > swallowing an exception somewhere.  This is what an uninitialized matrix
> > would give as a result.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I can reproduce outside of Jenkins.  It really seems odd that the answer
> >> is off by so much.
> >>
> >> On Dec 28, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
> >>
> >>> I vaguely remember Jenkins had problems with creating stuff in Java tmp
> >>> dir. E.g. I remember that was creating problems for Mr tasks in local
> mr
> >>> mode legitimately using boxed task temporary space.
> >>>
> >>> OK I'll try to scan for the problem tomorrow.
> >>> On Dec 27, 2011 10:50 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> So I am like everybody else.  The test works for me.
> >>>>
> >>>> My suspicion is that there is something going on with the temporary
> >>>> directory that I am trying to use and that the environment that
> Jenkins
> >> is
> >>>> using is somehow strange.
> >>>>
> >>>> The only slightly surprising idiom I am using is to create a temporary
> >>>> file, delete it and recreate it as a directory.  I even check the
> return
> >>>> values from the delete and the mkdir.
> >>>>
> >>>> I will keep looking.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Indeed it does.  Thanks for pointing that out.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This error is very strange.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <
> dlieu.7@gmail.com
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Ted,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> do you have an idea why this test may be failing? I think this
test
> >>>> comes
> >>>>>> with M-792 commit.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I can take a look at it, I suspect something in the environment
can
> be
> >>>>>> tripping it.
> >>>>>> On Dec 27, 2011 8:54 PM, "Sean Owen" <srowen@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It's all errors in the Apache infrastructure, rather than
a real
> test
> >>>>>>> failure. At least, stuff passes for me locally, and that's
what's
> >>>>>>> important.
> >>>>>>> So I'm ignoring these.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Jeff Eastman
> >>>>>>> <jeastman@windwardsolutions.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> I'm getting a lot of these emails yet all the tests
run locally
> for
> >>>>>> me.
> >>>>>>> Does
> >>>>>>>> anybody have an idea what the problem is? This close
to a release
> it
> >>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>> be really nice to have Jenkins on our side.
> >>>>>>>> Jeff
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------
> >> Grant Ingersoll
> >> http://www.lucidimagination.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message