Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mahout.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dlieu.7@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=f4Vpx+VQyG0KTftThPtEvrcJFv7fybvzRO+x7khMFwtjXEY1JMBWD0g3uOmbe3nYgs
         wDOadUjBk7ZUptKSj+1zEz5h/iYv20cSUMouSEAi9UOvfLp7prFC/M19060080ZZeO2y
         GRvz29a0zqDVHDOH3xBh/hXG8U4iHSv6sQ+aQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <99CF5A2B2A1D9542A589C5F5EBD3DA03040137CBFF@rock.narus.com>
References: <BANLkTi=5iv-6a86e16CuD7uMOACD05zcAw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTin1Wz4KJ6Da+vJBZaTiDVUTYT=SBw@mail.gmail.com>
	<28E67C4A-3664-4D79-B874-C5E67F8B448D@apache.org>
	<BANLkTik7WDbnPFy9P_P4OVBob9Y6ofKAjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikyjPE71sTQjBXAGn=L3O_t=X6NaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<99CF5A2B2A1D9542A589C5F5EBD3DA03040137CBD5@rock.narus.com>
	<BANLkTikWnzt0P-sUpSj1E+5hdYxqASJpGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<99CF5A2B2A1D9542A589C5F5EBD3DA03040137CBFF@rock.narus.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 11:49:56 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=BaQ5z51kZUD9g_NQkseYtsDv7rA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
From: Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlieu.7@gmail.com>
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

For what it's worth  i can add +1 but on the same basis i did it
before take 3. I won't be able to verify any of these new problems any
time soon.


On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Jeff Eastman <jeastman@narus.com> wrote:
> Will try to get you one today :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:59 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>
> Legally, we need 3 +1's on this thread on this RC.
>
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Jeff Eastman <jeastman@narus.com> wrote:
>> I did some cluster testing of take 2 and only found one potential issue =
surfaced by an example that is broken. Haven't waded through the 100+ posti=
ngs since I got back last night, but it looked good to me then.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:04 AM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>>
>> I am rushing around clearing the decks for my trip to Europe, but I very
>> much hope to take a gander today.
>>
>> Over the weekend, I did use the trunk distribution with good results. =
=A0I
>> didn't get the map-reduce stuff going since I was focussed on SGD work.
>> =A0There is a possible niggling issue with SGD, but should not hold up t=
he
>> release.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Grant -- any other thoughts? I'm generally assuming those +1s ca=
rry
>>> over, but would be ideal to hear the votes explicitly from the PMC. *Do=
*
>>> have a look through the artifacts! If nothing turns up, would be great =
to
>>> finish this up tonight! I have a backlog of commits ready.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Looking now.
>>>
>>
>