mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Eastman <jeast...@Narus.com>
Subject RE: Can L1Model, NormalModel, AsymmetricSampledNormalModel be removed?
Date Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:05:14 GMT
Makes sense to me. I will convert the tests to use the surviving models. Then we can either
remove these now or in the next release. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunning@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 10:40 AM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can L1Model, NormalModel, AsymmetricSampledNormalModel be removed?

Might be worthwhile targeting them at the surviving classes you mean?

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>wrote:

> Is there anything worthwhile in the tests to keep?
>
>
> On Apr 23, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
>
> > I marked them as deprecated recently. They are superceded by models
> within the Cluster hierarchy and were only used in early testing of
> Dirichlet, afaict. I think the GaussianCluster and DistanceMeasureCluster
> can replace them all.
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> > On 4/23/11 11:41 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> >> Let me take a look.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> On Apr 23, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Sean Owen<srowen@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Someone marked them deprecated recently. And they are not used except
> in
> >>> tests and a corresponding "Distribution" class, which are likewise
> unused
> >>> AFAICT.
> >
>
>
>
Mime
View raw message