mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] 0.4 take 2
Date Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:34:46 GMT
Hmm. It was there before, I think, but now you have me worried. I'll check.

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Benson. I'm doing a build now. Before you start the respin, can
> you verify that your src distributions include the conf directory at
> the top level as well?
>
> Drew
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Drew, I've got the fix. I'm starting the release respin now. Please do
>> an svn up to see what I did to the src assembly descriptor.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Drew Farris <drew@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Ok. I think I see the problem, the src.xml assembly should essentially
>>> have the same xml stanzas for the conf and bin directories that the
>>> bin.xml assembly does.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> I'm testing a fix that leaves it where it is now. Stand by.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Drew Farris <drew@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that we are agreed that it has to survive into the source
>>>>>> distribution (and the binary distribution as well, of course).
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, very much so. I'm looking at the assemblies now to figure out why
>>>>> that's not happening.
>>>>>I
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message