Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-mahout-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57258 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2010 06:53:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Sep 2010 06:53:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 35525 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2010 06:53:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mahout-dev-archive@mahout.apache.org Received: (qmail 35331 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2010 06:53:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mahout.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mahout.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mahout.apache.org Received: (qmail 35323 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2010 06:53:36 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 06:53:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.42] (HELO mail-vw0-f42.google.com) (209.85.212.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 06:53:13 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so4763566vws.1 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:52:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=BYDgbPvb+mNiqT4v67LV4cFTSJoc4X8iPOPHky+sSDI=; b=XCujOK/OO16+HljKBZCdo2j/afroYGRe3mIwM4v6Zqmv8W6t4QFHwyJ7RBiiRzAzJT vFPZNJmu9i8ei3HxwUsDSXTsqigONTivl6gWEPVyI6aR8a616EgjJXe3VbHYh/9rHtDW 48FOCxn6WtNx839bBt/iFTvUWftSavvBDrZ+0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Rsjs2YVdqAwREtRIiXldS4Ujo5RTJMA9eDGLiinroUtTf7scl+cbkAw3SIO52fxeLU eS/DAjlmLB02R287HEXnt5Qd9L88vXiiMAMjhIfjJIdceEhd4DrimRP02WIQkS/1AOpl L8xlAemiGTR77a4+l9q1K29dfNzB0945gN2sY= Received: by 10.220.122.203 with SMTP id m11mr3823047vcr.258.1284879172258; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:52:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.182.130 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:52:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:52:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problems with my apache mahout To: dev@mahout.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0050450167d5a44b510490973e32 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0050450167d5a44b510490973e32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Done. On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:44 PM, deneche abdelhakim wrote: > I posted my patch here (it's the last one dated to 19-09-2010): > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-323 > > if someone could commit it, I would be able to resolve this issue and > update the wiki accordingly. > > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:27 AM, deneche abdelhakim > wrote: > > Ok, thanks. I will prepare a patch and post it on JIRA. > > > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Sean Owen wrote: > >> I distantly remember there was a need to re-set passwords in the last > >> 6 months due to a security problem. > >> > >> root@ probably can't be expected to reply that fast, so I'd sit tight. > >> > >> If you need something committed one of us can surely do it. > >> > >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM, deneche abdelhakim < > adeneche@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I know I've away for some time now. But lately I started working again > >>> on Random Forests. When I tried to commit my changes, my svn password > >>> was not accepted. I wasn't sure if I changed my password, so I tried > >>> to reset it but then my people.apache.org password was not accepted > >>> too! > >>> I sent an email to infra@ to help me reset my password, and they > >>> kindly told me to send an email to root@ > >>> So I sent an email to root@apache.org two days ago but no answer !!! > >>> Maybe it's the weekend, but I thought I would ask here too, maybe > >>> there's a better way to solve this. > >>> > >> > > > --0050450167d5a44b510490973e32--