mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thomas Sauzedde (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MAHOUT-503) Bad murmur hash implementation ?!?
Date Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:22:33 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12910490#action_12910490
] 

Thomas Sauzedde edited comment on MAHOUT-503 at 9/17/10 3:20 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Didn't notice the comment neither the diff between the code base and the original port  :-(
Sorry, but now I know you were aware of a potential issue ;-)

Thanks


      was (Author: yaourt):
    Didn't notice the comment neither the diff between the code base and the original port
 :-(
Sorry, but now I know you was aware of a potential issue ;-)

Thanks

  
> Bad murmur hash implementation ?!?
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-503
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-503
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Classification
>            Reporter: Thomas Sauzedde
>
> It looks like the murmur hash implementation is coming from the original C to Java port
(see http://www.getopt.org/murmur/MurmurHash.java)
> According to http://dmy999.com/article/50/murmurhash-2-java-port, (not verified myself),
this port doesn't produce the same results than the original C code.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message