mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ]math[ 1.5, really?
Date Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:44:23 GMT
I don't know from Intellij, but here's my best attempt to explain.

Step 1: Sun has a bug. javac should reject these annotations, but does not.

Step 2: Various tools do not have this bug. They warn or explode.



On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Sean <srowen@gmail.com> wrote:
> But why would it work in Eclipse and not with javac? or rather, what's
> important is what javac does, in the main build. But that was working.
> But it doesn't. And I also just saw my IDE settings flip or something
> and it went haywire (IntelliJ). I am really confused.
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, you misunderstood me as to the nature of the problem I hit.
>>
>> If you start with a clean tree, and run the maven-eclipse-plugin, it
>> will copy the 1.5 settings from maven/javac to eclipse, and eclipse
>> will go ballistic. You can then manually reset the eclipse settings,
>> and it shuts up. In my personal opinion, this is a metastable
>> situation, and it would be better to kill all the annotations, since
>> some people like to use maven to run the eclipse \compiler/. However,
>> that's just my opinion.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Sean <srowen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yah that's what I thought too but Benson says that doesn't work and not what
>>> was in the pom.xml file.  But it worked. Until like yesterday. Color me
>>> confused.
>>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2010 9:00 AM, "Dawid Weiss" <dawid.weiss@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I wrote a post about this a while ago. You need to use the 1.6
>>> compiler, but set the target to 1.5 -- this way you can keep @Override
>>> annotations, but emit valid 1.5 code anyway. I don't know about Maven
>>> (javac), but it definitely works in Eclipse (can be set manually via
>>> project properties).
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
>>> wrote: > I thought we were...
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message