mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Mahout as TLP
Date Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:39:07 GMT
What are your ambivalencies, Ted?  I'm a little split myself, but all of my
"cons"
are very fuzzy and hard to articulate (mainly around timing).

Could you spell out why your +1 is any weaker than it could be?

  -jake

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am a bit ambivalent, but net +1 on this.  The deciding factor for me is
> that it makes it easier to express the sub-projects.
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > 1.  We'd like to organize several subprojects we wish to introduce
> (Core,
> > NLP, Recommenders/Taste, Ports - C++, etc.) that wouldn't really fit as
> > Lucene subprojects.
> >
> > And the collections package, vectors, verification and evaluation
> > code, potential test data sets... yes, makes sense to make it a TLP. I
> > don't think Lucene folks will mind -- it's not like Mahout is going to
> > depart from using Lucene/ Hadoop, etc.
> >
> > Not that my voice counts much here, but +1 to the idea.
> >
> > Dawid
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ted Dunning, CTO
> DeepDyve
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message