Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51285 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2010 19:44:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2010 19:44:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 74209 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2010 19:44:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 74151 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2010 19:44:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mahout-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 74141 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2010 19:44:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:44:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:44:26 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so19906qwd.53 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:44:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=lmHDGtG/hskQZOfolsP0GJ6d5F7AmkfPmBFeEIBJjXE=; b=L6Ee7XexDHNDy07FzsrZwt+CjyDMP/aoak05YFWgwhUJVks1InSPKOci9RNSAbVakD uUjyOOol8XVmsLBBax1mvZ9BV2soPWpFD1yxp+hs1y0hqtEGMGQNFHQjNTTOBjccrFtw NX/CiMHTwED9yeMJVql8vMQUunCAckogaH0+E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=TKjJd82scGiFCaJNzt0xomdjRsdzZW+GPaztfo5xAoBqe+bgESLl69jdE4SPoI8W2Q P1bk6Js2Z4yPZhvsc7XMxB8TdE1saOWisXPZCS6OyqQ1eUi5MvfqiIbNA0ELcc/onN21 0cbBvi1lSTN2OCmJ30ljrX4HADDZRcF4DHJH4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.32.10 with SMTP id a10mr2735033qcd.105.1264275845818; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:44:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <747770717.89861262833856172.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> <8f8e14c41001080825n7fc47acwc72ec8678c600513@mail.gmail.com> <8f8e14c41001221147r2b3a3cednb056f2869fb26392@mail.gmail.com> <8f8e14c41001230825v6882ea77x1426cb057f30fe7c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:44:05 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 28c633727eb85e39 Message-ID: <7c962aed1001231144k254b3b12ue731fbfed1a268f0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup From: Stack To: Ted Dunning Cc: stack@apache.org, mahout-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > From: Drew Farris > Date: Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:25 AM > Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup > To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org > > > How was the current hbase deployed to the apache repo under the mahout > package name? I'd be happy to help get these (and a newer hadoop) > rolled in, I'm just unsure of the process. > Speaking from hbase, we were not involved -- to the best of my knowledge -- adding hbase under mahout package up in the apache hbase repo, but all power to who ever did it. As to hbase showing up in the apache repo., snapshots of hbase trunk -- which is built against the hadoop 0.21 branch, which may not be what you want -- should be showing up under the hbase package sometime in the near future (The issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1933). In the way are our dependency on ZooKeeper and Thrift. These are not yet available in maven repositories (ZooKeeper is planning on publishing the next release to maven as Mahadev says below and some fine lads are working on getting thrift up into a repo under the guise of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-363). If someone wants to help out publishing current hbase (0.20.x), let us (me) know how we can help. Regards the zk and thrift dependencies, we're toying with putting these up in a temporary repository anyways which should do as a stopgap until we all grow into their maven deposited versions. Yours, St.Ack > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> Feedback from ZK and hbase folks: >> >> Mahadev Konar said: >> Unfortunately no.. We are planning to deploy 3.3 as the first version on >> maven repo. >> >> StAck said: >> We're working on hbase 0.21 as being the first hbase that shows up in >> a maven repo. >> >> It looks like we are on our own. >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Farris >> wrote: >> >>> Neither hbase 0.20.2 nor zookeeper (any version) appear to be in a >>> maven repo at this point, so Mahout would have to roll and deploy >>> these. What was the process that was followed to build and deploy the >>> mahout-packaged hadoop 0.20.1 and hbase artifacts? Is this something I >>> could submit a patch to Mahout for, or better left for the committers? >>> >>> As Ted pointed out, yes the release of zk is 3.2.2 >>> >>> Drew >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:12 AM, zhao zhendong >>> wrote: >>> > Hi Drew, >>> > >>> > I propose to >>> > 1) update hbase-0.20.0.jar to hbase-0.20.2.jar due to the later is >>> > stable >>> > and hbased-platform is based on this version, >>> > >>> > 2) and add zookeeper-3.2.1.jar. >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Zhendong >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, zhao zhendong >> >wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi Drew, >>> >> >>> >> Including a source code in snapshots that will be great. >>> >> >>> >> Currently, the HDFS reader does not work in 0.20.2. Without source >>> >> code, >>> >> it's not convenient for me to debug the code. >>> >> >>> >> Cheers, >>> >> Zhendong >>> >> >>> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Drew Farris >> >wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> I wonder if we can get the hadoop people to include source jars with >>> >>> their snapshots? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sean Owen wrote: >>> >>> > I need a fix after 0.20.1, that's the primary reason. As a bonus, >>> >>> > we >>> >>> > don't have to maintain our own version. The downside is relying on >>> >>> > a >>> >>> > SNAPSHOT, but seems worth it to me. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, zhao zhendong < >>> zhaozhendong@gmail.com> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >> Thanks Drew, >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> +1 for me to maintain a stable hadoop release, such as 0.20.1. The >>> >>> reason is >>> >>> >> obvious :) >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Cheers, >>> >>> >> Zhendong >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >>> >> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim) >>> >> >>> >> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>> >>> >> >>> >> Department of Computer Science >>> >> School of Computing >>> >> National University of Singapore >>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>><><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<< >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > >>> > Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim) >>> > >>> > <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>> >>> > >>> > Department of Computer Science >>> > School of Computing >>> > National University of Singapore >>> > >>> >>>>>>>><><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<< >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ted Dunning, CTO >> DeepDyve >> > > > > -- > Ted Dunning, CTO > DeepDyve > >