mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup
Date Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:44:05 GMT
> From: Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup
> To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> How was the current hbase deployed to the apache repo under the mahout
> package name? I'd be happy to help get these (and a newer hadoop)
> rolled in, I'm just unsure of the process.
>

Speaking from hbase, we were not involved -- to the best of my
knowledge -- adding hbase under mahout package up in the apache hbase
repo, but all power to who ever did it.

As to hbase showing up in the apache repo., snapshots of hbase trunk
-- which is built against the hadoop 0.21 branch, which may not be
what you want -- should be showing up under the hbase package sometime
in the near future (The issue is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1933).  In the way are our
dependency on ZooKeeper and Thrift.  These are not yet available in
maven repositories (ZooKeeper is planning on publishing the next
release to maven as Mahadev says below and some fine lads are working
on getting thrift up into a repo under the guise of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-363).

If someone wants to help out publishing current hbase (0.20.x), let us
(me) know how we can help.  Regards the zk and thrift dependencies,
we're toying with putting these up in a temporary repository anyways
which should do as a stopgap until we all grow into their maven
deposited versions.

Yours,
St.Ack


> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Feedback from ZK and hbase folks:
>>
>> Mahadev Konar said:
>> Unfortunately no.. We are planning to deploy 3.3 as the first version on
>> maven repo.
>>
>> StAck said:
>> We're working on hbase 0.21 as being the first hbase that shows up in
>> a maven repo.
>>
>> It looks like we are on our own.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Neither hbase 0.20.2 nor zookeeper (any version) appear to be in a
>>> maven repo at this point, so Mahout would have to roll and deploy
>>> these. What was the process that was followed to build and deploy the
>>> mahout-packaged hadoop 0.20.1 and hbase artifacts? Is this something I
>>> could submit a patch to Mahout for, or better left for the committers?
>>>
>>> As Ted pointed out, yes the release of zk is 3.2.2
>>>
>>> Drew
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:12 AM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhendong@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Drew,
>>> >
>>> > I propose to
>>> > 1) update hbase-0.20.0.jar to hbase-0.20.2.jar due to the later is
>>> > stable
>>> > and hbased-platform is based on this version,
>>> >
>>> > 2) and add zookeeper-3.2.1.jar.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Zhendong
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhendong@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi Drew,
>>> >>
>>> >> Including a source code in snapshots that will be great.
>>> >>
>>> >> Currently, the HDFS reader does not work in 0.20.2. Without source
>>> >> code,
>>> >> it's not convenient for me to debug the code.
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Zhendong
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> I wonder if we can get the hadoop people to include source jars
with
>>> >>> their snapshots?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> >>> > I need a fix after 0.20.1, that's the primary reason. As a
bonus,
>>> >>> > we
>>> >>> > don't have to maintain our own version. The downside is relying
on
>>> >>> > a
>>> >>> > SNAPSHOT, but seems worth it to me.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, zhao zhendong <
>>> zhaozhendong@gmail.com>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >> Thanks Drew,
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> +1 for me to maintain a stable hadoop release, such as
0.20.1. The
>>> >>> reason is
>>> >>> >> obvious :)
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> Cheers,
>>> >>> >> Zhendong
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>
>>> >> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim)
>>> >>
>>> >> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>>
>>> >>
>>> >> Department of Computer Science
>>> >> School of Computing
>>> >> National University of Singapore
>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>>>><><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<<
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim)
>>> >
>>> > <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>>
>>> >
>>> > Department of Computer Science
>>> > School of Computing
>>> > National University of Singapore
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>><><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<<
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ted Dunning, CTO
>> DeepDyve
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ted Dunning, CTO
> DeepDyve
>
>

Mime
View raw message