Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36659 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2009 13:11:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2009 13:11:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 26240 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2009 13:11:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26173 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2009 13:11:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mahout-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26163 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2009 13:11:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:11:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.225] (HELO mail-ew0-f225.google.com) (209.85.219.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:11:46 +0000 Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so3297020ewy.5 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:11:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lJeLP9dvI/Gwvg9Vs9v2D928Y1SD0ANe91pq6a4gDuI=; b=rxrgYqdaZMlF9Z6JwtXtDM38Ts2IMlg47zKHMyn427Rh2YEpyFbC78BvDIXKgM2qDP p7aTOsNOWLk/SefXvVNjL1aJimROqGl3rn3nqVqI6x85CyCqsVnUDTc73na9WvbUj4mh eozBorPnlbbASXV6y/RDQHbeqxDQT9tigsQk4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IEhiPld9Ro7XRvK8joH65eTOS2e6fIiWVOGlOZSIErpNJ/gNuhqp95qr0ohse9ChuZ 6VwENdhRZAVFmbhohu85BHbFhnRIVMDP1FpfJWdVCy8c7/F/NQQhnby6ONs/yRnAQN83 LX2coAH/GjodZEpKsHEIrnk4ONibgQb2+0lgw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.84 with SMTP id b62mr1862805wef.227.1260796284868; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:11:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <61b5d9410912110748i1f2f1de9x59dff94f0b1c1a2e@mail.gmail.com> <61b5d9410912131841m50b373f2q3efb4467b454a072@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:11:24 -0500 Message-ID: <61b5d9410912140511x5eeac479if7e5bbc1c0891ad5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: One more colt question From: Benson Margulies To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Have a look at my interim patch if you want to see me doing that. On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Depending on your thoughts of 0 / 0, we may already have tested them all > with no tests. > > (but humor aside, I agree that deprecating the interfaces just because th= ey > don't have tests isn't necessary quite right. =C2=A0We might want to depr= ecate > all unexamined interfaces until they are looked at) > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Benson Margulies = wrote: > >> OK, but you can't test an interface, can you? >> >> I'm incrementally removing them as I write some tests. >> >> >