Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89621 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2009 20:33:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2009 20:33:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 40961 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 20:33:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-mahout-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 40887 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 20:33:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mahout-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 40875 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2009 20:33:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:33:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of srowen@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.24] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:33:31 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1006470eyd.53 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:33:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y6POlu+GMP9utkF5EnoZcmHDy53g/e++1igGujpocfk=; b=rQ17Ch+HPohH7BtZcBTH250aioWuvc7B7LqGG3i8tsT5Dm99IlZtJCZ/T88dWwNhsC 3q+h8Y6p0rfCqMqfjUSVkgDAqYKgVyBbwM4RHHu5GUWpwogZyCBjSV1HwEWDzwmyTbJ0 u7DvNlHRJZX/BEm01Txp8xgQLj76TovdjBWbQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jWnfqh+OYkTh6yh48b2wuo9aGzweBr204rAq3IYARmvDzRMHzMWdji/bv4JXviPYj4 o5Br8QafylUUMRGJc+iSXAa/miz/AwtbzjAnuuO6oBUzpujtmxbhdN6ZUqn1ul/q7/e8 0qE5RkQtyndAB9KVTyBfG/mqRm1Lhfi4XuFeA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.9 with SMTP id x9mr1246875wee.0.1249331589644; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:33:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <160541.16543.qm@web50301.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <160541.16543.qm@web50301.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:33:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Taste review From: Sean Owen To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes I think that is the meaning, and I don't intend to 'expand' along these lines (by myself -- sounds like a nice sibling project). I see it as fairly separate question, what the inputs means and how they are constructed. It's not like supplying a fork but no spoon. So that's why I didn't quite get why that's somehow a disadvantage. Kind of like criticizing Tomcat for not including Wordpress or something. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Regarding "only doing CF" - maybe they mean to imply there are no other i= nputs other than co-visitation data. =C2=A0For example, no watching of user= behaviour on the page (how long did they stay? =C2=A0did they scroll? =C2= =A0did they page? =C2=A0did they highlight a piece of text while reading?) = or consideration of document similarity. > > Of course, Taste is not at all web-specific, so that user behaviour is so= mething one would/could build on top of Taste. =C2=A0But of course they did= n't email mahout-user to discuss this first -- it's not in their interest. = :) >