mahout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lukáš Vlček" <lukas.vl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Maven POMs
Date Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:27:25 GMT
I was always asking myself what is so special about projects like Lucene,
Hadoop (and possibly Mahout?) that maven can not be used as a project
management tool for them. I haven't heard an answer until these days (...
"these projects are complex" is not an answer for me).

Lukas

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 8:05 AM, pi song <pi.songs@gmail.com> wrote:

> That depends. If you want to do something very different from the default
> model maven provides, it could be very painful sometimes. Maven is more
> like
> a coffee machine that you push a button and it just works. You can't
> configure much.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have had the chance to use a maven centric build just lately from the
> > IntelliJ point of view and found it painless to keep the pom as the
> master
> > structure.  IntelliJ can even sync back to the pom.
> >
> > I don't think that using ant from maven would be as useful as switching
> > over
> > entirely to maven.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Karl Wettin <karl.wettin@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I've managed to keep the POMs in sync locally at least up until a month
> > > ago. Hopefully it's not too much of a hassle to update them. It was
> > mostly
> > > trouble with nested deps that needed to be excluded. Also,
> > core/src/examples
> > > needs to be moved to a new maven module in order to work and that will
> > > require touching the ant build.
> > >
> > > Sorry for my recent inactivity and short communication the last weeks!
> > Been
> > > busy catching the sun, changing country and moving to a new apartment.
> > Have
> > > a whole bunch of halfbaked patches and comments here. Please allow a
> few
> > > days for me to sync with trunk and catch up with discussions on the
> fora.
> > >
> > >
> > >      karl
> > >
> > >
> > > 5 aug 2008 kl. 04.06 skrev Sean Owen:
> > >
> > >
> > >  That's nice -- how about targets that need more customized scripting?
> > >> I suppose we can keep those separate, and connect them to the
> > >> auto-generated build file. At least then build logic is not
> > >> duplicated. Sounds good?
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:56 PM, pi song <pi.songs@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> You can generate ant build file/intelliJ project file/Eclipse project
> > >>> file
> > >>> from Maven poms. One way is to too keep maven as your master so you
> > don't
> > >>> have to maintain both.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>  I don't know, I have not found a great solution for this. I don't
> use
> > >>>> Maven myself but am not against learning how to use it effectively.
> > >>>> Part of that is sorting out how to keep it in sync with Ant build
> > >>>> scripts. We could delegate all building to Ant. Perhaps that's
the
> > >>>> easiest way.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Anyone know enough about Maven to understand best practices? I
> assume
> > >>>> some does or else we wouldn't be bothering with it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Grant Ingersoll <
> gsingers@apache.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> So, what's are plan for the Maven poms?  How do we intend to
keep
> > them
> > >>>>> in
> > >>>>> sync such that they are actually useful for those who want
to use
> > Maven
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> (not
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> me, but others...)?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Grant
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ted
> >
>



-- 
http://blog.lukas-vlcek.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message