mahout-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject [CONF] Apache Mahout > Recommender Documentation
Date Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:04:01 GMT
Space: Apache Mahout (
Page: Recommender Documentation (

Edited by Sean Owen:
h2. Overview
Taste is a flexible, fast collaborative filtering engine for Java. The engine takes users'
preferences for items ("tastes") and returns estimated preferences for other items. For example,
a site that sells books or CDs could easily use Taste to figure out, from past purchase data,
which CDs a customer might be interested in listening to.

Taste provides a rich set of components from which you can construct a customized recommender
system from a selection of algorithms. Taste is designed to be enterprise-ready; it's designed
for performance, scalability and flexibility.

Taste is not just for Java; it can be run as an external server which exposes recommendation
logic to your application via web services and HTTP.

Top-level packages define the Taste interfaces to these key abstractions:
* DataModel
* UserSimilarity
* ItemSimilarity
* UserNeighborhood
* Recommender

Subpackages of {{}} hold implementations of these interfaces.
These are the pieces from which you will build your own recommendation engine. That's it!
For the academically inclined, Taste supports both *memory-based*, *item-based* recommender
systems, *slope one* recommenders, and a couple other experimental implementations. It does
not currently support *model-based* recommenders.

h2. Architecture


This diagram shows the relationship between various Taste components in a user-based recommender.
An item-based recommender system is similar except that there are no PreferenceInferrers or
Neighborhood algorithms involved.

h3. Recommender
A {{Recommender}} is the core abstraction in Taste. Given a {{DataModel}}, it can produce
recommendations. Applications will most likely use the{{GenericUserBasedRecommender}} implementation
{{GenericItemBasedRecommender}}, possibly decorated by {{CachingRecommender}}.

h3. DataModel
A {{DataModel}} is the interface to information about user preferences. An implementation
might draw this data from any source, but a database is the most likely source. Taste provides
{{MySQLJDBCDataModel}} to access preference data from a database via JDBC, though many applications
will want to write their own. Taste also provides a{{FileDataModel}}.

There are no abstractions for a user or item in the object model (not anymore). Users and
items are identified solely by an ID value in the framework. Further, this ID value must be
numeric; it is a Java {{long}} type through the APIs. A {{Preference}} object or {{PreferenceArray}}
object encapsulates the relation between user and preferred items (or items and users preferring

Finally, Taste supports, in various ways, a so-called "boolean" data model in which users
do not express preferences of varying strengths for items, but simply express an association
or none at all. For example, while users might express a preference from 1 to 5 in the context
of a movie recommender site, there may be no notion of a preference value between users and
pages in the context of recommending pages on a web site: there is only a notion of an association,
or none, between a user and pages that have been visited.

h3. UserSimilarity
A {{UserSimilarity}} defines a notion of similarity between two{{User</span>s. This
is a crucial part of a recommendation engine. These are attached to a {{Neighborhood}} implementation.
{{ItemSimilarity}}s are analagous, but find similarity between{{Item}}s.

h3. UserNeighborhood
In a user-based recommender, recommendations are produced by finding a "neighborhood" of similar
users near a given user. A {{UserNeighborhood}} defines a means of determining that neighborhood
&mdash; for example, nearest 10 users. Implementations typically need a {{UserSimilarity}}
to operate.

h2. Requirements
h3. Required

* [Java/ J2SE 6.0|]

h3. Optional
* [Apache Ant|] 1.5 or later and [Apache Maven|]
 2.0.10 or later, if you want to build from source or build examples. (Mac users note that
even OS X 10.5 ships with Maven 2.0.6, which will not work.)
* Taste web applications require a [Servlet 2.3+|]
container, such as [Apache Tomcat|]. It may in fact work
with oldercontainers with slight modification.
* {{MySQLJDBCDataModel}} implementation requires a [MySQL 4.x|]
(or later) database. Again, it may be made to work with earlier versions or other databases
with slight changes.

h2. Demo

To build and run the demo, follow the instructions below, which are written for Unix-like
operating systems:
* Obtain a copy of the Mahout distribution, either from SVN or as a downloaded archive.
* Download the "1 Million MovieLens Dataset" from [|]
* Unpack the archive and copy {{movies.dat}} and {{ratings.dat}} to {{trunk/taste-web/src/main/resources/org/apache/mahout/cf/taste/example/grouplens}}
under the Mahout distribution directory.
* Navigate to the directory where you unpacked the Mahout distribution, and navigate to {{trunk}}.
* Run {{mvn install}}, which builds and installs Mahout core to your local repository
* {{cd taste-web}}
* {{cp ../examples/target/grouplens.jar ./lib}}
* Edit {{}} and fill in the{{recommender.class}}: {{}}
* {{mvn package}}
* {{mvn jetty:run-war}}. You may need to give Maven more memory: in a bash shell, {{export
* Get recommendations by accessing the web application in your browser: {{http://localhost:8080/RecommenderServlet?userID=1}}
This will produce a simple preference-item ID list which could be consumed by a client application.
Get more useful human-readable output with the {{debug}} parameter: {{http://localhost:8080/RecommenderServlet?userID=1&debug=true}}
Incidentally, Taste's web service interface may then be found at: {{http://localhost:8080/RecommenderService.jws}}

Its WSDL file will be here...


... and you can even access it in your browser via a simple HTTP request:


*Note:* the exact URL where the service is deployed depends on how you deployed the application
in your app server. For instance if you deployed it as a .war file called 'mahout-taste-webapp.war',
it will deploy at a URI whose path begins with /mahout-taste-webapp/ instead.

h2. Examples
h3. User-based Recommender
User-based recommenders are the "original", conventional style of recommender system. They
can produce good recommendations when tweaked properly; they are not necessarily the fastest
recommender systems and are thus suitable for small data sets (roughly, less than ten million
ratings). We'll start with an example of this.

First, create a {{DataModel}} of some kind. Here, we'll use a simple on based on data in a
file. The file should be in CSV format, with lines of the form {{userID,itemID,prefValue}}
(e.g. "39505,290002,3.5"):

{{DataModel model = new FileDataModel(new File("data.txt"));}}

We'll use the PearsonCorrelationSimilarity implementation of {{UserSimilarity}} as our user
correlation algorithm, and add an optional preference inference algorithm:

UserSimilarity userSimilarity = new PearsonCorrelationSimilarity(model);
// Optional:
userSimilarity.setPreferenceInferrer(new AveragingPreferenceInferrer());

Now we create a {{UserNeighborhood}} algorithm. Here we use nearest-3:

UserNeighborhood neighborhood =
          new NearestNUserNeighborhood(3, userSimilarity, model);{code}

Now we can create our{{Recommender}}, and add a caching decorator:

Recommender recommender =
          new GenericUserBasedRecommender(model, neighborhood, userSimilarity);
Recommender cachingRecommender = new CachingRecommender(recommender);

Now we can get 10 recommendations for user ID "1234" &mdash; done!
List<RecommendedItem> recommendations =
          cachingRecommender.recommend(1234, 10);

h3.Item-based Recommender

We could have created an item-based recommender instead. Item-based recommender base recommendation
not on user similarity, but on item similarity. In theory these are about the same approach
to the problem, just from different angles. However the similarity of two items is relatively
fixed, more so than the similarity of two users. So, item-based recommenders can use pre-computed
similarity values in the computations, which make them much faster. For large data sets, item-based
recommenders are more appropriate.

Let's start over, again with a {{FileDataModel}} to start:

DataModel model = new FileDataModel(new File("data.txt"));

We'll also need an{{ItemSimilarity}}. We could use{{PearsonCorrelationSimilarity}}, which
computes item similarity in realtime, but, this is generally too slow to be useful. Instead,
in a real application, you would feed a list of pre-computed correlations to a {{GenericItemSimilarity}}:

// Construct the list of pre-compted correlations
Collection<GenericItemSimilarity.ItemItemSimilarity> correlations =
ItemSimilarity itemSimilarity =
          new GenericItemSimilarity(correlations);


Then we can finish as before to produce recommendations:

Recommender recommender =
          new GenericItemBasedRecommender(model, itemSimilarity);
Recommender cachingRecommender = new CachingRecommender(recommender);
List<RecommendedItem> recommendations =
          cachingRecommender.recommend(1234, 10);

h3. Slope-One Recommender
This is a simple yet effective {{Recommender}} and we present another example to round out
the list:

DataModel model = new FileDataModel(new File("data.txt"));
          // Make a weighted slope one recommender
          Recommender recommender = new SlopeOneRecommender(model);
          Recommender cachingRecommender = new CachingRecommender(recommender);

h2.Integration with your application
h3. Direct

You can create a {{Recommender}}, as shown above, wherever you like in your Java application,
and use it. This includes simple Java applications or GUI applications, server applications,
and J2EE web applications.

h3. Standalone server
Taste can also be run as an external server, which may be the only option for non-Java applications.
A Taste Recommender can be exposed as a web application via{{}},
and your application can then access recommendations via simple HTTP requests and response,
or as a full-fledged SOAP web service. See above, and see {{the javadoc}} for details.

To deploy your {{Recommender}} as an external server:

* Obtain a copy of the Mahout distribution, either from SVN or as a downloaded archive.
* Create an implementation of {{}} (must
have a no-arg constructor).
* Compile it and create a JAR file containing your implementation.
* Navigate to the directory where you unpacked the Mahout distribution, and navigate to{{trunk}}.
* Run{{mvn install}}, which builds and installs Mahout core to your local repository
* {{cd taste-web}}
* Copy your .jar file: {{cp [your .jar file] ./lib}}
* Edit {{}} and fill in the {{recommender.class}} with your Recommender
clas: {{recommender.class=[your recommender class]}}
* {{mvn package}}
* Your .war file is now available in the build directory as {{mahout-taste-webapp.war}} (which
can be renamed).

h2. Performance
h3. Runtime Performance
The more data you give Taste, the better. Though Taste is designed for performance, you will
undoubtedly run into performance issues at some point. For best results, consider using the
following commad-line flags to your JVM:

* {{-server}}: Enables the server VM, which is generally appropriate for long-running, computation-intensive
* {{-Xms1024m -Xmx1024m}}: Make the heap as big as possible -- a gigabyte doesn't hurt when
dealing with tens millions of preferences. Taste will generally use as much memory as you
give it for caching, which helps performance. Set the initial and max size to the same value
to avoid wasting time growing the heap, and to avoid having the JVM run minor collections
to avoid growing the heap, which will clear cached values.
* {{-da -dsa}}: Disable all assertions.
* {{-XX:+NewRatio=9}}: Increase heap allocated to 'old' objects, which is most of them in
this framework
* {{-XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:+UseParallelOldGC}} (multi-processor machines only): Use a GC algorithm
designed to take advantage of multiple processors, and designed for throughput. This is a
default in J2SE 5.0.
* {{-XX:-DisableExplicitGC}}: Disable calls to{{System.gc()}}. These calls can only hurt in
the presence of modern GC algorithms; they may force Taste to remove cached data needlessly.
This flag isn't needed if you're sure your code and third-party code you use doesn't call
this method.

Also consider the following tips:

* Use {{CachingRecommender}} on top of your custom {{Recommender}} implementation.
* When using {{JDBCDataModel}}, make sure you've taken basic steps to optimize the table storing
preference data. Create a primary key on the user ID and item ID columns, and an index on
them. Set them to be non-null. And so on. Tune your database for lots of concurrent reads!
When using JDBC, the database is almost always the bottleneck. Plenty of memory and caching
are even more important.
* Also, pooling database connections is essential to performance. If using a J2EE container,
it probably provides a way to configure connection pools. If you are creating your own {{DataSource}}
directly, try wrapping it in {{}}
* See MySQL-specific notes on performance in the javadoc for {{MySQLJDBCDataModel}}.

h3.Algorithm Performance: Which One Is Best?
There is no right answer; it depends on your data, your application, environment, and performance
needs. Taste provides the building blocks from which you can construct the best {{Recommender}}
for your application. The links below provide research on this topic. You will probably need
a bit of trial-and-error to find a setup that works best. The code sample above provides a
good starting point.

Fortunately, Taste provides a way to evaluate the accuracy of your {{Recommender}} on your
own data, in{{}}:

DataModel myModel = ...;
RecommenderBuilder builder = new RecommenderBuilder() {
  public Recommender buildRecommender(DataModel model) {
    // build and return the Recommender to evaluate here

RecommenderEvaluator evaluator =
          new AverageAbsoluteDifferenceRecommenderEvaluator();
double evaluation = evaluator.evaluate(builder, myModel, 0.9, 1.0);

For "boolean" data model situations, where there are no notions of preference value, the above
evaluation based on estimated preference does not make sense. In this case, try this kind
of evaluation, which presents traditional information retrieval figures like precision and
recall, which are more meaningful:

RecommenderIRStatsEvaluator evaluator =
        new GenericRecommenderIRStatsEvaluator();
IRStatistics stats =
        evaluator.evaluate(builder, myModel, null, 3,

h2. Useful Links
You'll want to look at these packages too, which offer more algorithms and approaches that
you may find useful:

* [Cofi|]: A Java-Based Collaborative Filtering Library
* [CoFE|]

Here's a handful of research papers that I've read and found particularly useful:

J.S. Breese, D. Heckerman and C. Kadie, "[Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for
Collaborative Filtering|,"
in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainity in Artificial Intelligence (UAI
1998), 1998.

B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan and J. Riedl, "[Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation
algorithms|]" in Proceedings of the Tenth International
Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW 10), pp. 285-295, 2001.

P. Resnick, N. Iacovou, M. Suchak, P. Bergstrom and J. Riedl, "[GroupLens: an open architecture
for collaborative filtering of netnews|]" in Proceedings
of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 1994), pp. 175-186,

J.L. Herlocker, J.A. Konstan, A. Borchers and J. Riedl, "[An algorithmic framework for performing
collaborative filtering|]" in Proceedings of the
22nd annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information
Retrieval (SIGIR 99), pp. 230-237, 1999.

Clifford Lyon, "[Movie Recommender|]" CSCI
E-280 final project, Harvard University, 2004.

Daniel Lemire, Anna Maclachlan, "[Slope One Predictors for Online Rating-Based Collaborative
Filtering|]," Proceedings of SIAM Data
Mining (SDM '05), 2005.

Michelle Anderson, Marcel Ball, Harold Boley, Stephen Greene, Nancy Howse, Daniel Lemire and
Sean McGrath, "[RACOFI: A Rule-Applying Collaborative Filtering System|">,"
Proceedings of COLA '03, 2003.

These links will take you to all the collaborative filtering reading you could ever want!
* [Paul Perry's notes|]
* [James Thornton's collaborative filtering resources|]
* [Daniel Lemire's blog|] which frequently covers collaborative
filtering topics

Change your notification preferences:

View raw message