Mailing-List: contact user-help@lucy.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@lucy.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <5106B258.4000802@aevum.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:16:08 +0100
From: Nick Wellnhofer <wellnhofer@aevum.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: user@lucy.apache.org
CC: fgl <freakygreenleaky@gmail.com>, lucy-user@lucene.apache.org
References: 
 <CAN+xCOtomG1qB4dn7Oqoi31Gnfgv3xXEfCwNkuxjvhePmkcuTA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAN+xCOtomG1qB4dn7Oqoi31Gnfgv3xXEfCwNkuxjvhePmkcuTA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [lucy-user] Latest revision and parallel
 ClusterSearcher/SearchServer

On 28/01/2013 17:13, fgl wrote:
> 1.  If we svn up to latest, I take it we'll need to reindex all?

That depends on the version you're upgrading from, but probably yes.

> 2.  Is the take-away from LUCY-204/5 that cluster searching now operates in
> parallel?  ie, none of the old serial-by-search-node which leads to 10s -
> 60s+ search times (instead of sub-second if using a single node)?

LucyX::Remote::ClusterSearcher queries the search servers in parallel 
now, so searching should be much faster. I'd be interested to hear what 
kind of improvements people get with large indexes.

Nick