Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-lucy-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-lucy-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 272E09C5C for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78108 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2011 13:43:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-lucy-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78081 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2011 13:43:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucy-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: lucy-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list lucy-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78070 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2011 13:43:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:43:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gorankent@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:43:48 +0000 Received: by vcbgb30 with SMTP id gb30so466075vcb.6 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 06:43:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=77tKsrVLrGdc2H564bciJf6Hr480ZW12i6Gz5TyC8IA=; b=Dpsp4wVmqEdDdo1VywVvQopCIlij9gl8uWGRCWacoZScjAlFuObsRANSAdd73cI7HY QDb13A6KKOjREmaU/EHeFAHDNbKP+wq3DczbiGMnx3N7hk6l2wtcJ/wBf3uzs494JR+c 8bKDvw28PjiOrumVgJOkK+fET1rbzuZH7WOyI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.33.84 with SMTP id p20mr14815757vdi.32.1320414208071; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 06:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.116.33 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 06:43:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:43:28 +0200 Message-ID: From: goran kent To: lucy-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [lucy-user] Re: Major performance degradation with remote search Just to confirm to myself that I wasn't f'ing up, I re-ran the queries from the search machine, adding remote nodes to it one at a time, and sure enough, the query time increases with the equivalent search time of each node. If I execute the query using the cmd-line on all the remote machines (via pdsh) in parallel, then each one bounces back with the expected .1-.3 times, nice and zippy. Do 'em all together via LucyX::Remote::SearchClient, and the query time drops to sum(time*N).