Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-lucy-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-lucy-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EAE29694 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 21:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55454 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2011 21:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-lucy-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55429 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2011 21:28:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucy-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: lucy-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list lucy-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55421 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2011 21:28:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:28:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.116.39.62] (HELO rectangular.com) (68.116.39.62) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:28:04 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWaYc-0007Bd-6v for lucy-dev@incubator.apache.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:22:10 -0800 Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 13:22:10 -0800 From: Marvin Humphrey To: lucy-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: <20111202212210.GA27577@rectangular.com> References: <20111202002812.GB11791@rectangular.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] RFC: Grant all ASF Committers Lucy SVN karma On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:03:07PM -0800, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : I'd like to propose that the Lucy podling consider nuking our Subversion authz > : entry, allowing anyone who is a Committer at the ASF to commit to the Lucy > : corner of the ASF repository. > .... > : Of course we would still have a soft rule in place that significant changes > : must be run through lucy-dev first, but we would trust other committers to > : follow this rule rather than enforce it through access control as we do today. > > My suggestion would be that since this isn't something many apache > projects do (yet) this "soft rule" should probably be written down in the > form of loose guidelines somewhere ... wiki, wwwsite, COMMITTERS.txt, > whatever. IMO, the perfect place for this is the new CONTRIBUTING document which I committed yesterday, which sits next to README at the top level of our source tree -- it's better to have this rule communicated by something which travels with the code rather than hope that people find it out on a wiki somewhere. Here's how CONTRIBUTING starts off: =========================== Contributing to Apache Lucy ========================== MAKE A PLAN: If you're looking for something to work on, see the STATUS file for a list of development priorities that the Lucy community has already built consensus around. If you propose to make non-trivial changes to Lucy, especially changes to the public API, send a note to the Lucy developer's list describing your plans: http://incubator.apache.org/lucy/mailing_lists.html GET THE CODE: ... I think that second paragraph suffices. We don't have to spell out negative consequences or draft finely graded rules. Marvin Humphrey