lucy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.2.0 RC 3
Date Sun, 07 Aug 2011 16:29:42 GMT
+1. All tests pass on FreeBSD 9-BETA (Perl 5.12.4).

----- Original Message -----
> From: Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com>
> To: lucy-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2011 3:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.2.0 RC 3
> 
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 07:02:11PM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>>  I'm hoping that if we gently remind our Mentors, we will get the needed
>>  votes during this phase; if we don't, we'll have to recruit 
> freelancer votes
>>  from other Incubator PMC members on general@incubator.
> 
> The vote tally stands at four +1 votes from Lucy PPMC members, including two
> Incubator PMC +1 votes (from Chris Mattmann and myself).  We need one more +1
> from a member of the Incubator PMC.
> 
> Hoss, Upayavira, Joe... can one of you please review the release artifacts?
> (VOTE thread start at <http://markmail.org/message/7gyiojuxein2tfid>).
> 
> There's an inquiry over on the lucy-user list from someone who wants to
> develop on Linux and deploy on Windows.  Lucy 0.1.0 won't suffice for that,
> because of all the Windows build bugs -- but 0.2.0 should work fine.  I would
> like to be able to answer "You should use Lucy 0.2.0" without 
> reservation.
> 
> It would also be nice to close this downstream bug regarding compilation
> failure under Strawberry Perl 5.10.1:
> <https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=69442>.
> 
> The portability fixes in 0.2.0 may not affect anyone in the Lucy development
> community directly, but we clearly have users waiting on them.
> 
> Marvin Humphrey
>

Mime
View raw message